MT-LENS: An all-in-one Toolkit for Better Machine Translation Evaluation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We introduce MT-LENS, a framework designed to evaluate Machine Translation (MT) systems across a variety of tasks, including translation quality, gender bias detection, added toxicity, and robustness to misspellings. While several toolkits have become very popular for benchmarking the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), existing evaluation tools often lack the ability to thoroughly assess the diverse aspects of MT performance. MT-LENS addresses these limitations by extending the capabilities of LM-eval-harness for MT, supporting state-of-the-art datasets and a wide range of evaluation metrics. It also offers a user-friendly platform to compare systems and analyze translations with interactive visualizations. MT-LENS aims to broaden access to evaluation strategies that go beyond traditional translation quality evaluation, enabling researchers and engineers to better understand the performance of a NMT model and also easily measure system's biases.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Dec 2024.
Builds on
25 of 47 references.
References · 25
- 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
- 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,790
- 2019fairseq: A Fast, Extensible Toolkit for Sequence Modelingcited by 1,486
- 2022No Language Left Behind: Scaling Human-Centered Machine Translationcited by 1,290
- 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,196
- 2017Six Challenges for Neural Machine Translationcited by 334
- 2017Synthetic and Natural Noise Both Break Neural Machine Translationcited by 304
- 2023xCOMET: Transparent Machine Translation Evaluation through Fine-grained Error Detectioncited by 260
- 2024Tower: An Open Multilingual Large Language Model for Translation-Related Taskscited by 205
- 2022"I'm sorry to hear that": Finding New Biases in Language Models with a Holistic Descriptor Datasetcited by 160
- 2020The Tatoeba Translation Challenge -- Realistic Data Sets for Low Resource and Multilingual MTcited by 127
- 2020Gender in Danger? Evaluating Speech Translation Technology on the MuST-SHE Corpuscited by 57
13 more
- 2019compare-mt: A Tool for Holistic Comparison of Language Generation Systemscited by 43
- 2022MT-GenEval: A Counterfactual and Contextual Dataset for Evaluating Gender Accuracy in Machine Translationcited by 38
- 2022Toxicity in Multilingual Machine Translation at Scalecited by 26
- 2024Guardians of the Machine Translation Meta-Evaluation: Sentinel Metrics Fall In!cited by 21
- 2024What the Harm? Quantifying the Tangible Impact of Gender Bias in Machine Translation with a Human-centered Studycited by 15
- 2021Extending Challenge Sets to Uncover Gender Bias in Machine Translation: Impact of Stereotypical Verbs and Adjectivescited by 14
- 2024MuTox: Universal MUltilingual Audio-based TOXicity Dataset and Zero-shot Detectorcited by 14
- 2024A Prompt Response to the Demand for Automatic Gender-Neutral Translationcited by 12
- 2024The power of Prompts: Evaluating and Mitigating Gender Bias in MT with LLMscited by 12
- 2024Watching the Watchers: Exposing Gender Disparities in Machine Translation Quality Estimationcited by 10
- 2024Did Translation Models Get More Robust Without Anyone Even Noticing?cited by 9
- 2023Added Toxicity Mitigation at Inference Time for Multimodal and Massively Multilingual Translationcited by 5
- 2023ReSeTOX: Re-learning attention weights for toxicity mitigation in machine translationcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.