An Analysis of Source-Side Grammatical Errors in NMT
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The quality of Neural Machine Translation (NMT) has been shown to significantly degrade when confronted with source-side noise. We present the first large-scale study of state-of-the-art English-to-German NMT on real grammatical noise, by evaluating on several Grammar Correction corpora. We present methods for evaluating NMT robustness without true references, and we use them for extensive analysis of the effects that different grammatical errors have on the NMT output. We also introduce a technique for visualizing the divergence distribution caused by a source-side error, which allows for additional insights.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 24 May 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 2.
6 papers.
- 2022RuCoLA: Russian Corpus of Linguistic Acceptabilitycited by 26
- 2023CODET: A Benchmark for Contrastive Dialectal Evaluation of Machine Translationcited by 9
- 2024Did Translation Models Get More Robust Without Anyone Even Noticing?cited by 9
- 2021Autocorrect in the Process of Translation -- Multi-task Learning Improves Dialogue Machine Translationcited by 8
- 2025Misspellings in Natural Language Processing: A surveycited by 3
- 2025A Representation Level Analysis of NMT Model Robustness to Grammatical Errorscited by 1
- 2025A Representation Level Analysis of NMT Model Robustness to Grammatical Errors27 May 2025
- 2025Misspellings in Natural Language Processing: A survey28 Jan 2025
- 2024Did Translation Models Get More Robust Without Anyone Even Noticing?6 Mar 2024
- 2023CODET: A Benchmark for Contrastive Dialectal Evaluation of Machine Translation26 May 2023
- 2022RuCoLA: Russian Corpus of Linguistic Acceptability23 Oct 2022
- 2021Autocorrect in the Process of Translation -- Multi-task Learning Improves Dialogue Machine Translation30 Mar 2021