mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Performance Evaluation of Semi-supervised Learning Frameworks for Multi-Class Weed Detection

arXiv 2403.03390 ↗First posted 6 Mar 2024cs.CV cs.LG eess.IVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Effective weed control plays a crucial role in optimizing crop yield and enhancing agricultural product quality. However, the reliance on herbicide application not only poses a critical threat to the environment but also promotes the emergence of resistant weeds. Fortunately, recent advances in precision weed management enabled by ML and DL provide a sustainable alternative. Despite great progress, existing algorithms are mainly developed based on supervised learning approaches, which typically demand large-scale datasets with manual-labeled annotations, which is time-consuming and labor-intensive. As such, label-efficient learning methods, especially semi-supervised learning, have gained increased attention in the broader domain of computer vision and have demonstrated promising performance. These methods aim to utilize a small number of labeled data samples along with a great number of unlabeled samples to develop high-performing models comparable to the supervised learning counterpart trained on a large amount of labeled data samples. In this study, we assess the effectiveness of a semi-supervised learning framework for multi-class weed detection, employing two well-known object detection frameworks, namely FCOS and Faster-RCNN. Specifically, we evaluate a generalized student-teacher framework with an improved pseudo-label generation module to produce reliable pseudo-labels for the unlabeled data. To enhance generalization, an ensemble student network is employed to facilitate the training process. Experimental results show that the proposed approach is able to achieve approximately 76% and 96% detection accuracy as the supervised methods with only 10% of labeled data in CottenWeedDet3 and CottonWeedDet12, respectively. We offer access to the source code, contributing a valuable resource for ongoing semi-supervised learning research in weed detection and beyond.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 79 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Mar 2024.

Builds on

37 of 79 references.

References · 37

  1. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  2. 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,829
  3. 2015SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detectorcited by 3,125
  4. 2015Fast R-CNNcited by 2,930
  5. 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,080
  6. 2020YOLOv4: Optimal Speed and Accuracy of Object Detectioncited by 1,624
  7. 2017Improved Regularization of Convolutional Neural Networks with Cutoutcited by 1,623
  8. 2019FCOS: Fully Convolutional One-Stage Object Detectioncited by 1,573
  9. 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,390
  10. 2022DINO: DETR with Improved DeNoising Anchor Boxes for End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 1,306
  11. 2019Self-training with Noisy Student improves ImageNet classificationcited by 1,304
  12. 2018Deep Clustering for Unsupervised Learning of Visual Featurescited by 1,020
25 more
  1. 2019EfficientDet: Scalable and Efficient Object Detectioncited by 1,018
  2. 2018CornerNet: Detecting Objects as Paired Keypointscited by 763
  3. 2019Bridging the Gap Between Anchor-based and Anchor-free Detection via Adaptive Training Sample Selectioncited by 539
  4. 2020Generalized Focal Loss: Learning Qualified and Distributed Bounding Boxes for Dense Object Detectioncited by 408
  5. 2018Deep Learning for Generic Object Detection: A Surveycited by 392
  6. 2021End-to-End Semi-Supervised Object Detection with Soft Teachercited by 315
  7. 2021Unbiased Teacher for Semi-Supervised Object Detectioncited by 305
  8. 2020A Simple Semi-Supervised Learning Framework for Object Detectioncited by 282
  9. 2016Joint Unsupervised Learning of Deep Representations and Image Clusterscited by 205
  10. 2022RTMDet: An Empirical Study of Designing Real-Time Object Detectorscited by 192
  11. 2019Bottom-up Object Detection by Grouping Extreme and Center Pointscited by 156
  12. 2023A Comprehensive Review of YOLO Architectures in Computer Vision: From YOLOv1 to YOLOv8 and YOLO-NAScited by 149
  13. 2021Self-supervised Learning is More Robust to Dataset Imbalancecited by 122
  14. 2021Instant-Teaching: An End-to-End Semi-Supervised Object Detection Frameworkcited by 112
  15. 2019A Survey of Deep Learning-based Object Detectioncited by 106
  16. 2020Generalized Focal Loss V2: Learning Reliable Localization Quality Estimation for Dense Object Detectioncited by 104
  17. 2019Deep Learning vs. Traditional Computer Visioncited by 94
  18. 2016A Unified Multi-scale Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Fast Object Detectioncited by 83
  19. 2022Unbiased Teacher v2: Semi-supervised Object Detection for Anchor-free and Anchor-based Detectorscited by 69
  20. 2022Fully Convolutional One-Stage 3D Object Detection on LiDAR Range Imagescited by 56
  21. 2021Rethinking Pseudo Labels for Semi-Supervised Object Detectioncited by 45
  22. 2022Label Matching Semi-Supervised Object Detectioncited by 44
  23. 2019Distilling Knowledge From a Deep Pose Regressor Networkcited by 34
  24. 2023Label-Efficient Learning in Agriculture: A Comprehensive Reviewcited by 16
  25. 2021Performance Evaluation of Deep Transfer Learning on Multiclass Identification of Common Weed Species in Cotton Production Systemscited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

3 papers.