mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Resource-Constrained UAV-Based Weed Detection for Site-Specific Management on Edge Devices

arXiv 2604.23442 ↗First posted 25 Apr 2026cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Weeds compete with crops for light, water, and nutrients, reducing yield and crop quality. Efficient weed detection is essential for site-specific weed management (SSWM). Although deep learning models have been deployed on UAV-based edge systems, a systematic understanding of how different model architectures perform under real-world resource constraints is still lacking. To address this gap, this study proposes a deployment-oriented framework for real-time UAV-based weed detection on resource-constrained edge platforms. The framework integrates UAV data acquisition, model development, and on-device inference, with a focus on balancing detection accuracy and computational efficiency. A diverse set of state-of-the-art object detection models is evaluated, including convolution-based YOLO models (v8-v12) and transformer-based RT-DETR models (v1-v2). Experiments on three edge devices (Jetson Orin Nano, Jetson AGX Xavier, and Jetson AGX Orin) demonstrate clear trade-offs between accuracy and inference latency across models and hardware configurations. Results show that high-capacity models achieve up to 86.9% mAP50 but suffer from high latency, limiting real-time deployment. In contrast, lightweight models achieve 66%-71% mAP50 with significantly lower latency, enabling real-time performance. Among all models, RT-DETRv2-R50-M achieves competitive accuracy (79% mAP50) with improved efficiency, while YOLOv10n provides the fastest inference speed. YOLOv11s and RT-DETRv2-R50-M offer the best balance between accuracy and speed, making them strong candidates for real-time UAV deployment.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Apr 2026.

Builds on

19 of 49 references.

References · 19

  1. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  2. 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,384
  3. 2020YOLOv4: Optimal Speed and Accuracy of Object Detectioncited by 1,624
  4. 2018ShuffleNet V2: Practical Guidelines for Efficient CNN Architecture Designcited by 1,132
  5. 2023DETRs Beat YOLOs on Real-time Object Detectioncited by 526
  6. 2024YOLOv10: Real-Time End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 508
  7. 2024YOLOv9: Learning What You Want to Learn Using Programmable Gradient Informationcited by 422
  8. 2021Bottleneck Transformers for Visual Recognitioncited by 364
  9. 2025YOLOv12: Attention-Centric Real-Time Object Detectorscited by 300
  10. 2023A Comprehensive Review of YOLO Architectures in Computer Vision: From YOLOv1 to YOLOv8 and YOLO-NAScited by 149
  11. 2024RT-DETRv2: Improved Baseline with Bag-of-Freebies for Real-Time Detection Transformercited by 88
  12. 2025YOLOv13: Real-Time Object Detection with Hypergraph-Enhanced Adaptive Visual Perceptioncited by 57
7 more
  1. 2024RT-DETRv3: Real-time End-to-End Object Detection with Hierarchical Dense Positive Supervisioncited by 31
  2. 2018Fully Convolutional Networks with Sequential Information for Robust Crop and Weed Detection in Precision Farmingcited by 15
  3. 2024Comparative Analysis of YOLOv9, YOLOv10 and RT-DETR for Real-Time Weed Detectioncited by 7
  4. 2025Assessing the Capability of YOLO- and Transformer-based Object Detectors for Real-time Weed Detectioncited by 5
  5. 2024Performance Evaluation of Semi-supervised Learning Frameworks for Multi-Class Weed Detectioncited by 3
  6. 2024SPARROW: Smart Precision Agriculture Robot for Ridding of Weedscited by 2
  7. 2025A Comprehensive Evaluation of YOLO-based Deer Detection Performance on Edge Devicescited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.