mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Neural Field Classifiers via Target Encoding and Classification Loss

arXiv 2403.01058 ↗First posted 2 Mar 2024cs.CV cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Neural field methods have seen great progress in various long-standing tasks in computer vision and computer graphics, including novel view synthesis and geometry reconstruction. As existing neural field methods try to predict some coordinate-based continuous target values, such as RGB for Neural Radiance Field (NeRF), all of these methods are regression models and are optimized by some regression loss. However, are regression models really better than classification models for neural field methods? In this work, we try to visit this very fundamental but overlooked question for neural fields from a machine learning perspective. We successfully propose a novel Neural Field Classifier (NFC) framework which formulates existing neural field methods as classification tasks rather than regression tasks. The proposed NFC can easily transform arbitrary Neural Field Regressor (NFR) into its classification variant via employing a novel Target Encoding module and optimizing a classification loss. By encoding a continuous regression target into a high-dimensional discrete encoding, we naturally formulate a multi-label classification task. Extensive experiments demonstrate the impressive effectiveness of NFC at the nearly free extra computational costs. Moreover, NFC also shows robustness to sparse inputs, corrupted images, and dynamic scenes.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Mar 2024.

Builds on

21 of 38 references.

References · 21

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2020Implicit Neural Representations with Periodic Activation Functionscited by 2,214
  3. 2021NeuS: Learning Neural Implicit Surfaces by Volume Rendering for Multi-view Reconstructioncited by 1,701
  4. 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
  5. 2020D-NeRF: Neural Radiance Fields for Dynamic Scenescited by 1,459
  6. 20234D Gaussian Splatting for Real-Time Dynamic Scene Renderingcited by 1,144
  7. 2021Volume Rendering of Neural Implicit Surfacescited by 990
  8. 2021Direct Voxel Grid Optimization: Super-fast Convergence for Radiance Fields Reconstructioncited by 961
  9. 2020Neural Sparse Voxel Fieldscited by 959
  10. 2019Differentiable Volumetric Rendering: Learning Implicit 3D Representations without 3D Supervisioncited by 699
  11. 2021UNISURF: Unifying Neural Implicit Surfaces and Radiance Fields for Multi-View Reconstructioncited by 643
  12. 2021Neural Fields in Visual Computing and Beyondcited by 539
9 more
  1. 2015Label-Embedding for Image Classificationcited by 164
  2. 2018Beyond One-hot Encoding: lower dimensional target embeddingcited by 42
  3. 2020Adaptive Inertia: Disentangling the Effects of Adaptive Learning Rate and Momentumcited by 40
  4. 2020Artificial Neural Variability for Deep Learning: On Overfitting, Noise Memorization, and Catastrophic Forgettingcited by 28
  5. 2021Positive-Negative Momentum: Manipulating Stochastic Gradient Noise to Improve Generalizationcited by 28
  6. 2023Strivec: Sparse Tri-Vector Radiance Fieldscited by 28
  7. 2020On the Overlooked Pitfalls of Weight Decay and How to Mitigate Them: A Gradient-Norm Perspectivecited by 25
  8. 2023S3IM: Stochastic Structural SIMilarity and Its Unreasonable Effectiveness for Neural Fieldscited by 25
  9. 2015A Review Paper: Noise Models in Digital Image Processingcited by 23

Built on by

Not cited yet.