mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Authors' Values and Attitudes Towards AI-bridged Scalable Personalization of Creative Language Arts

arXiv 2403.00439 ↗First posted 1 Mar 2024cs.HC cs.AIcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Generative AI has the potential to create a new form of interactive media: AI-bridged creative language arts (CLA), which bridge the author and audience by personalizing the author's vision to the audience's context and taste at scale. However, it is unclear what the authors' values and attitudes would be regarding AI-bridged CLA. To identify these values and attitudes, we conducted an interview study with 18 authors across eight genres (e.g., poetry, comics) by presenting speculative but realistic AI-bridged CLA scenarios. We identified three benefits derived from the dynamics between author, artifact, and audience: those that 1) authors get from the process, 2) audiences get from the artifact, and 3) authors get from the audience. We found how AI-bridged CLA would either promote or reduce these benefits, along with authors' concerns. We hope our investigation hints at how AI can provide intriguing experiences to CLA audiences while promoting authors' values.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 98 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Mar 2024.

Builds on

21 of 98 references.

References · 21

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,863
  3. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  4. 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,568
  5. 2020RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language Modelscited by 1,255
  6. 2023Structure and Content-Guided Video Synthesis with Diffusion Modelscited by 590
  7. 2022Social Simulacra: Creating Populated Prototypes for Social Computing Systemscited by 301
  8. 2022CoAuthor: Designing a Human-AI Collaborative Writing Dataset for Exploring Language Model Capabilitiescited by 249
  9. 2022Co-Writing Screenplays and Theatre Scripts with Language Models: An Evaluation by Industry Professionalscited by 191
  10. 2021DiffSinger: Singing Voice Synthesis via Shallow Diffusion Mechanismcited by 154
  11. 2021Sparks: Inspiration for Science Writing using Language Modelscited by 80
  12. 2014Narrative Planning: Balancing Plot and Charactercited by 61
9 more
  1. 2021The Impact of Multiple Parallel Phrase Suggestions on Email Input and Composition Behaviour of Native and Non-Native English Writerscited by 61
  2. 2022Beyond Text Generation: Supporting Writers with Continuous Automatic Text Summariescited by 47
  3. 2023Choice Over Control: How Users Write with Large Language Models using Diegetic and Non-Diegetic Promptingcited by 36
  4. 2023The AI Ghostwriter Effect: When Users Do Not Perceive Ownership of AI-Generated Text But Self-Declare as Authorscited by 22
  5. 2021Enhancing Content Preservation in Text Style Transfer Using Reverse Attention and Conditional Layer Normalizationcited by 20
  6. 2016Mechanical Novel: Crowdsourcing Complex Work through Reflection and Revisioncited by 13
  7. 2020Heteroglossia: In-Situ Story Ideation with the Crowdcited by 12
  8. 2018Play as You Like: Timbre-enhanced Multi-modal Music Style Transfercited by 11
  9. 2022OtherTube: Facilitating Content Discovery and Reflection by Exchanging YouTube Recommendations with Strangerscited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 8; 2026: 3.

13 papers.

Sort: