mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The SMART approach to instance-optimal online learning

arXiv 2402.17720 ↗First posted 27 Feb 2024cs.LG cs.DS cs.ITcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We devise an online learning algorithm -- titled Switching via Monotone Adapted Regret Traces (SMART) -- that adapts to the data and achieves regret that is instance optimal, i.e., simultaneously competitive on every input sequence compared to the performance of the follow-the-leader (FTL) policy and the worst case guarantee of any other input policy. We show that the regret of the SMART policy on any input sequence is within a multiplicative factor e/(e-1) ≈ 1.58 of the smaller of: 1) the regret obtained by FTL on the sequence, and 2) the upper bound on regret guaranteed by the given worst-case policy. This implies a strictly stronger guarantee than typical `best-of-both-worlds' bounds as the guarantee holds for every input sequence regardless of how it is generated. SMART is simple to implement as it begins by playing FTL and switches at most once during the time horizon to the worst-case algorithm. Our approach and results follow from an operational reduction of instance optimal online learning to competitive analysis for the ski-rental problem. We complement our competitive ratio upper bounds with a fundamental lower bound showing that over all input sequences, no algorithm can get better than a 1.43-fraction of the minimum regret achieved by FTL and the minimax-optimal policy. We also present a modification of SMART that combines FTL with a ``small-loss" algorithm to achieve instance optimality between the regret of FTL and the small loss regret bound.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Feb 2024.

Builds on

24 of 47 references.

References · 24

  1. 2019Introduction to Multi-Armed Banditscited by 481
  2. 2018Stochastic bandits robust to adversarial corruptionscited by 119
  3. 2018More Adaptive Algorithms for Adversarial Banditscited by 114
  4. 2016Corralling a Band of Bandit Algorithmscited by 100
  5. 2014A Second-order Bound with Excess Lossescited by 95
  6. 2020The Primal-Dual method for Learning Augmented Algorithmscited by 80
  7. 2020Model Selection in Contextual Stochastic Bandit Problemscited by 71
  8. 2013Follow the Leader If You Can, Hedge If You Mustcited by 70
  9. 2021Smoothed Analysis with Adaptive Adversariescited by 57
  10. 2022Smoothed Online Learning is as Easy as Statistical Learningcited by 52
  11. 2015Fast rates in statistical and online learningcited by 47
  12. 2016MetaGrad: Multiple Learning Rates in Online Learningcited by 47
12 more
  1. 2018On the optimality of the Hedge algorithm in the stochastic regimecited by 33
  2. 2015Scale-Free Algorithms for Online Linear Optimizationcited by 30
  3. 2020Prediction with Corrupted Expert Advicecited by 27
  4. 2019Improved Path-length Regret Bounds for Banditscited by 23
  5. 2022Online Algorithms with Multiple Predictionscited by 22
  6. 2022Algorithms with Prediction Portfolioscited by 19
  7. 2023Best of Both Worlds Policy Optimizationcited by 17
  8. 2017Following the Leader and Fast Rates in Linear Prediction: Curved Constraint Sets and Other Regularitiescited by 11
  9. 2020Relaxing the I.I.D. Assumption: Adaptively Minimax Optimal Regret via Root-Entropic Regularizationcited by 8
  10. 2023Smoothed Analysis of Sequential Probability Assignmentcited by 7
  11. 2022Best of Both Worlds in Online Control: Competitive Ratio and Policy Regretcited by 6
  12. 2023Best of Both Worlds Guarantees for Smoothed Online Quadratic Optimizationcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.