Comparison of Conventional Hybrid and CTC/Attention Decoders for Continuous Visual Speech Recognition
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Thanks to the rise of deep learning and the availability of large-scale audio-visual databases, recent advances have been achieved in Visual Speech Recognition (VSR). Similar to other speech processing tasks, these end-to-end VSR systems are usually based on encoder-decoder architectures. While encoders are somewhat general, multiple decoding approaches have been explored, such as the conventional hybrid model based on Deep Neural Networks combined with Hidden Markov Models (DNN-HMM) or the Connectionist Temporal Classification (CTC) paradigm. However, there are languages and tasks in which data is scarce, and in this situation, there is not a clear comparison between different types of decoders. Therefore, we focused our study on how the conventional DNN-HMM decoder and its state-of-the-art CTC/Attention counterpart behave depending on the amount of data used for their estimation. We also analyzed to what extent our visual speech features were able to adapt to scenarios for which they were not explicitly trained, either considering a similar dataset or another collected for a different language. Results showed that the conventional paradigm reached recognition rates that improve the CTC/Attention model in data-scarcity scenarios along with a reduced training time and fewer parameters.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Feb 2024.
Builds on
30 of 63 references.
References · 30
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2020Conformer: Convolution-augmented Transformer for Speech Recognitioncited by 1,863
- 2018ESPnet: End-to-End Speech Processing Toolkitcited by 558
- 2015Listen, Attend and Spellcited by 543
- 2018Deep Audio-Visual Speech Recognitioncited by 322
- 2018LRS3-TED: a large-scale dataset for visual speech recognitioncited by 308
- 2022Learning Audio-Visual Speech Representation by Masked Multimodal Cluster Predictioncited by 287
- 2016Lip Reading Sentences in the Wildcited by 228
- 2019A Comparative Study on Transformer vs RNN in Speech Applicationscited by 211
- 2018Scaling Neural Machine Translationcited by 204
18 more
- 2021End-to-end Audio-visual Speech Recognition with Conformerscited by 151
- 2023Auto-AVSR: Audio-Visual Speech Recognition with Automatic Labelscited by 114
- 2021Is Someone Speaking? Exploring Long-term Temporal Features for Audio-visual Active Speaker Detectioncited by 113
- 2022Visual Speech Recognition for Multiple Languages in the Wildcited by 95
- 2019RWTH ASR Systems for LibriSpeech: Hybrid vs Attention -- w/o Data Augmentationcited by 63
- 2021Sub-word Level Lip Reading With Visual Attentioncited by 63
- 2021LiRA: Learning Visual Speech Representations from Audio through Self-supervisioncited by 44
- 2023MuAViC: A Multilingual Audio-Visual Corpus for Robust Speech Recognition and Robust Speech-to-Text Translationcited by 39
- 2021Look Who's Talking: Active Speaker Detection in the Wildcited by 21
- 2023AV-SUPERB: A Multi-Task Evaluation Benchmark for Audio-Visual Representation Modelscited by 19
- 2018Zero-shot keyword spotting for visual speech recognition in-the-wildcited by 15
- 2020Silent Speech Interfaces for Speech Restoration: A Reviewcited by 14
- 2021Visual Keyword Spotting with Attentioncited by 11
- 2017Decoding visemes: improving machine lipreadingcited by 7
- 2023LIP-RTVE: An Audiovisual Database for Continuous Spanish in the Wildcited by 7
- 2017Resolution limits on visual speech recognitioncited by 5
- 2017Which phoneme-to-viseme maps best improve visual-only computer lip-reading?cited by 4
- 2023Analysis of Visual Features for Continuous Lipreading in Spanishcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.