Decoding visemes: improving machine lipreading
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine lipreading (MLR) is speech recognition from visual cues and a niche research problem in speech processing & computer vision. Current challenges fall into two groups: the content of the video, such as rate of speech or; the parameters of the video recording e.g, video resolution. We show that HD video is not needed to successfully lipread with a computer. The term "viseme" is used in machine lipreading to represent a visual cue or gesture which corresponds to a subgroup of phonemes where the phonemes are visually indistinguishable. A phoneme is the smallest sound one can utter, because there are more phonemes per viseme, maps between units show a many-to-one relationship. Many maps have been presented, we compare these and our results show Lee's is best. We propose a new method of speaker-dependent phoneme-to-viseme maps and compare these to Lee's. Our results show the sensitivity of phoneme clustering and we use our new knowledge to augment a conventional MLR system. It has been observed in MLR, that classifiers need training on test subjects to achieve accuracy. Thus machine lipreading is highly speaker-dependent. Conversely speaker independence is robust classification of non-training speakers. We investigate the dependence of phoneme-to-viseme maps between speakers and show there is not a high variability of visemes, but there is high variability in trajectory between visemes of individual speakers with the same ground truth. This implies a dependency upon the number of visemes within each set for each individual. We show that prior phoneme-to-viseme maps rarely have enough visemes and the optimal size, which varies by speaker, ranges from 11-35. Finally we decode from visemes back to phonemes and into words. Our novel approach uses the optimum range visemes within hierarchical training of phoneme classifiers and demonstrates a significant increase in classification accuracy.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
7 papers.
- 2021Lip reading using external viseme decodingcited by 5
- 2026The Lipreading Gap: Do VSR Models Perceive Visual Speech Like Human Lipreaders?cited by 3
- 2023Leveraging Visemes for Better Visual Speech Representation and Lip Readingcited by 2
- 2023Automated Speaker Independent Visual Speech Recognition: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 0
- 2024Comparison of Conventional Hybrid and CTC/Attention Decoders for Continuous Visual Speech Recognitioncited by 0
- 2025Evaluation of End-to-End Continuous Spanish Lipreading in Different Data Conditionscited by 0
- 2026Diffusion Large Language Models for Visual Speech Recognitioncited by 0
- 2026The Lipreading Gap: Do VSR Models Perceive Visual Speech Like Human Lipreaders?5 Jun 2026
- 2026Diffusion Large Language Models for Visual Speech Recognition27 May 2026
- 2025Evaluation of End-to-End Continuous Spanish Lipreading in Different Data Conditions1 Feb 2025
- 2024Comparison of Conventional Hybrid and CTC/Attention Decoders for Continuous Visual Speech Recognition20 Feb 2024
- 2023Leveraging Visemes for Better Visual Speech Representation and Lip Reading19 Jul 2023
- 2023Automated Speaker Independent Visual Speech Recognition: A Comprehensive Survey14 Jun 2023
- 2021Lip reading using external viseme decoding10 Apr 2021