A novel framework for adaptive stress testing of autonomous vehicles in multi-lane roads
On the map: End-to-end autonomous driving → Adversarial scenarios and safety testing
Abstract (arXiv)
Stress testing is an approach for evaluating the reliability of systems under extreme conditions which help reveal vulnerable scenarios that standard testing may overlook. Identifying such scenarios is of great importance in autonomous vehicles (AV) and other safety-critical systems. Since failure events are rare, naive random search approaches require a large number of vehicle operation hours to identify potential system failures. Adaptive Stress Testing (AST) is a method addressing this constraint by effectively exploring the failure trajectories of AV using a Markov decision process and employs reinforcement learning techniques to identify driving scenarios with high probability of failures. However, existing AST frameworks are able to handle only simple scenarios, such as one vehicle moving longitudinally on a single lane road which is not realistic and has a limited applicability. In this paper, we propose a novel AST framework to systematically explore corner cases of intelligent driving models that can result in safety concerns involving both longitudinal and lateral vehicle's movements. Specially, we develop a new reward function for Deep Reinforcement Learning to guide the AST in identifying crash scenarios based on the collision probability estimate between the AV under test (i.e., the ego vehicle) and the trajectory of other vehicles on the multi-lane roads. To demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework, we tested it with a complex driving model vehicle that can be controlled in both longitudinal and lateral directions. Quantitative and qualitative analyses of our experimental results demonstrate that our framework outperforms the state-of-the-art AST scheme in identifying corner cases with complex driving maneuvers.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Adversarial scenarios and safety testing, one of 9 directions in End-to-end autonomous driving. Builds on 13 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Feb 2024.
Builds on
13 of 53 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 12
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
- 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,302
- 2019A Survey of Deep Learning Techniques for Autonomous Drivingcited by 401
- 2017On a Formal Model of Safe and Scalable Self-driving Carscited by 129
- 2023Motion Planning for Autonomous Driving: The State of the Art and Future Perspectivescited by 112
- 2020A Survey of Algorithms for Black-Box Safety Validation of Cyber-Physical Systemscited by 71
- 2019Adaptive Stress Testing for Autonomous Vehiclescited by 70
- 2019Adaptive Stress Testing with Reward Augmentation for Autonomous Vehicle Validationcited by 33
- 2019Efficient Autonomy Validation in Simulation with Adaptive Stress Testingcited by 13
- 2020The Adaptive Stress Testing Formulationcited by 4
- 2023Adaptive Failure Search Using Critical States from Domain Expertscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026SPHINX: First Explain, Then Explorecited by 0
- 2026SPHINX: First Explain, Then Explore16 Jun 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Generating Critical Scenarios for Testing Automated Driving Systems
- 2026Importance Sampling and PCA for Finding Failures in Commercial Autonomous Vehicles
- 2023DeepQTest: Testing Autonomous Driving Systems with Reinforcement Learning and Real-world Weather Data
- 2026ScenePilot: Controllable Boundary-Driven Critical Scenario Generation for Autonomous Driving
- 2025Advanced Longitudinal Control and Collision Avoidance for High-Risk Edge Cases in Autonomous Driving
- 2021Building Safer Autonomous Agents by Leveraging Risky Driving Behavior Knowledge
- 2023ReMAV: Reward Modeling of Autonomous Vehicles for Finding Likely Failure Events
- 2026A Risk-Field Enhanced Closed-Loop Digital Twin Framework for Autonomous Driving Safety Validation