mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Adaptive Failure Search Using Critical States from Domain Experts

arXiv 2304.00365 ↗First posted 1 Apr 2023cs.RO cs.AI cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Uncovering potential failure cases is a crucial step in the validation of safety critical systems such as autonomous vehicles. Failure search may be done through logging substantial vehicle miles in either simulation or real world testing. Due to the sparsity of failure events, naive random search approaches require significant amounts of vehicle operation hours to find potential system weaknesses. As a result, adaptive searching techniques have been proposed to efficiently explore and uncover failure trajectories of an autonomous policy in simulation. Adaptive Stress Testing (AST) is one such method that poses the problem of failure search as a Markov decision process and uses reinforcement learning techniques to find high probability failures. However, this formulation requires a probability model for the actions of all agents in the environment. In systems where the environment actions are discrete and dependencies among agents exist, it may be infeasible to fully characterize the distribution or find a suitable proxy. This work proposes the use of a data driven approach to learn a suitable classifier that tries to model how humans identify {critical states and use this to guide failure search in AST. We show that the incorporation of critical states into the AST framework generates failure scenarios with increased safety violations in an autonomous driving policy with a discrete action space.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Apr 2023.

Builds on

11 of 22 references.

References · 11

  1. 2015End-to-End Training of Deep Visuomotor Policiescited by 847
  2. 2020Deep Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving: A Surveycited by 698
  3. 2017On a Formal Model of Safe and Scalable Self-driving Carscited by 129
  4. 2018Scalable End-to-End Autonomous Vehicle Testing via Rare-event Simulationcited by 76
  5. 2019Adaptive Stress Testing for Autonomous Vehiclescited by 70
  6. 2017How Should a Robot Assess Risk? Towards an Axiomatic Theory of Risk in Roboticscited by 57
  7. 2020Multimodal Safety-Critical Scenarios Generation for Decision-Making Algorithms Evaluationcited by 54
  8. 2018Establishing Appropriate Trust via Critical Statescited by 47
  9. 2019Adaptive Stress Testing with Reward Augmentation for Autonomous Vehicle Validationcited by 33
  10. 2018Simulation-based Adversarial Test Generation for Autonomous Vehicles with Machine Learning Componentscited by 28
  11. 2020The Adaptive Stress Testing Formulationcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Importance Sampling and PCA for Finding Failures in Commercial Autonomous Vehicles
  2. 2024Generating Critical Scenarios for Testing Automated Driving Systems
  3. 2023DeepQTest: Testing Autonomous Driving Systems with Reinforcement Learning and Real-world Weather Data
  4. 2022How Do We Fail? Stress Testing Perception in Autonomous Vehicles
  5. 2021Multi-Agent Vulnerability Discovery for Autonomous Driving with Hazard Arbitration Reward
  6. 2022Automatically Learning Fallback Strategies with Model-Free Reinforcement Learning in Safety-Critical Driving Scenarios
  7. 2026From Particles to Perils: SVGD-Based Hazardous Scenario Generation for Autonomous Driving Systems Testing
  8. 2025ADReFT: Adaptive Decision Repair for Safe Autonomous Driving via Reinforcement Fine-Tuning