mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Reward Generalization in RLHF: A Topological Perspective

arXiv 2402.10184 ↗First posted 15 Feb 2024cs.LG cs.AI cs.CLcited by 9

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF

Abstract (arXiv)

Existing alignment methods share a common topology of information flow, where reward information is collected from humans, modeled with preference learning, and used to tune language models. However, this shared topology has not been systematically characterized, nor have its alternatives been thoroughly explored, leaving the problems of low data efficiency and unreliable generalization unaddressed. As a solution, we introduce a theory of reward generalization in reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), focusing on the topology of information flow at both macro and micro levels. At the macro level, we portray the RLHF information flow as an autoencoding process over behavior distributions, formalizing the RLHF objective of distributional consistency between human preference and model behavior. At the micro level, we present induced Bayesian networks to model the impact of dataset topologies on reward generalization. Combining analysis on both levels, we propose reward modeling from tree-structured preference information. It is shown to reduce reward uncertainty by up to Theta(log n/loglog n) times compared to baselines, where n is the dataset size. Validation on three NLP tasks shows that it achieves an average win rate of 65% against baselines, thus improving reward generalization for free via topology design, while reducing the amount of data requiring annotation.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 31 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Feb 2024.

Builds on

31 of 58 references.

Closest ancestors · 11

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Iterative Preference Learning from Human Feedback: Bridging Theory and Practice for RLHF under KL-Constraint18 Dec
  2. 2023Reinforced Self-Training (ReST) for Language Modeling17 Aug
  3. 2023Open Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback27 Jul
  4. 2023Fine-Grained Human Feedback Gives Better Rewards for Language Model Training2 Jun
  5. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model29 May
  6. 2023RAFT: Reward rAnked FineTuning for Generative Foundation Model Alignment13 Apr
  7. 2023RRHF: Rank Responses to Align Language Models with Human Feedback without tears11 Apr
  8. 2022Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimization19 Oct
  9. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback12 Apr
  10. 2018Scalable agent alignment via reward modeling: a research direction19 Nov
  11. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences12 Jun

Other references · 20

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,856
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,592
  3. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,979
  4. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,916
  5. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,492
  6. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,348
  7. 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,672
  8. 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,181
  9. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 3,011
  10. 2021Show Your Work: Scratchpads for Intermediate Computation with Language Modelscited by 878
  11. 2023BeaverTails: Towards Improved Safety Alignment of LLM via a Human-Preference Datasetcited by 853
  12. 2023Weak-to-Strong Generalization: Eliciting Strong Capabilities With Weak Supervisioncited by 454
8 more
  1. 2023Preference Ranking Optimization for Human Alignmentcited by 284
  2. 2021DialogSum: A Real-Life Scenario Dialogue Summarization Datasetcited by 182
  3. 2021Goal Misgeneralization in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 123
  4. 2022Goal Misgeneralization: Why Correct Specifications Aren't Enough For Correct Goalscited by 123
  5. 2023Why think step by step? Reasoning emerges from the locality of experiencecited by 103
  6. 2024Aligner: Efficient Alignment by Learning to Correctcited by 98
  7. 2020Generalization bounds for deep learningcited by 38
  8. 2023Tree of Uncertain Thoughts Reasoning for Large Language Modelscited by 19

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 6; 2026: 2.

9 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback: A Statistical Perspective
  2. 2024Secrets of RLHF in Large Language Models Part II: Reward Modeling
  3. 2026Generalisation of RLHF under Reward Shift and Clipped KL Regularisation
  4. 2024Towards Reliable Alignment: Uncertainty-aware RLHF
  5. 2024Personalizing Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with Variational Preference Learning
  6. 2025A Unified Pairwise Framework for RLHF: Bridging Generative Reward Modeling and Policy Optimization
  7. 2025Uncertainty Quantification for Large Language Model Reward Learning under Heterogeneous Human Feedback
  8. 2025Information-Theoretic Reward Modeling for Stable RLHF: Detecting and Mitigating Reward Hacking