mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

MemReward: Graph-Based Experience Memory for LLM Reward Prediction with Limited Labels

arXiv 2603.19310 ↗First posted 13 Mar 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 1

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement learning has emerged as a powerful paradigm for improving large language model (LLM) reasoning, where rollouts are sampled from the policy and reward signals computed on those rollouts are used to update the policy. However, in data-scarce scenarios, obtaining ground-truth labels to verify rollouts at scale often requires expensive human annotation or labor-intensive expert verification. For instance, evaluating mathematical proofs demands expert review, and open-ended question answering lacks definitive ground truth. When ground-truth labels are scarce, the effectiveness of reinforcement learning fine-tuning is constrained. Inspired by the success of semi-supervised learning in propagating labels from labeled to unlabeled samples, we propose MemReward, a graph-based experience memory framework that integrates reward propagation directly into online policy optimization. MemReward stores rollouts (thinking processes and final answers) from an initial LLM policy as nodes in a heterogeneous graph connected by similarity and structural edges, over which a GNN propagates rewards from labeled to unlabeled rollouts. To train such a framework, we first warm up the GNN on labeled rollouts to predict rewards via heterogeneous aggregation over query, thinking, and answer nodes. During online RL fine-tuning, unlabeled rollouts are attached to the graph by query similarity, and the GNN predicts their rewards, yielding a hybrid reward acquisition strategy that combines ground-truth and GNN-predicted rewards. Experiments on Qwen2.5-1.5B and 3B in mathematics, question answering, and code generation demonstrate that MemReward, with ground-truth rewards on only 20% of rollouts, achieves 96.6% of Oracle performance on 1.5B and 97.3% on 3B, and closely approaches Oracle on out-of-domain tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 43 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Mar 2026.

Builds on

43 of 54 references.

Closest ancestors · 10

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Noise-corrected GRPO: From Noisy Rewards to Unbiased Gradients21 Oct
  2. 2025DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scale18 Mar
  3. 2025Process Reinforcement through Implicit Rewards3 Feb
  4. 2024Rewarding Progress: Scaling Automated Process Verifiers for LLM Reasoning10 Oct
  5. 2024ReST-MCTS*: LLM Self-Training via Process Reward Guided Tree Search6 Jun
  6. 2023Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations14 Dec
  7. 2023Let's Verify Step by Step31 May
  8. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model29 May
  9. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback15 Dec
  10. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms20 Jul

Other references · 33

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
  3. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  4. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
  5. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
  6. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
  7. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  8. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
  9. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
  10. 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,637
  11. 2017Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistrycited by 3,487
  12. 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,883
21 more
  1. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
  2. 2019Fast Graph Representation Learning with PyTorch Geometriccited by 2,434
  3. 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,164
  4. 2023Code Llama: Open Foundation Models for Codecited by 2,139
  5. 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,085
  6. 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,822
  7. 2017Modeling Relational Data with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 1,694
  8. 2025Search-R1: Training LLMs to Reason and Leverage Search Engines with Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,444
  9. 2023Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 1,391
  10. 2019Self-training with Noisy Student improves ImageNet classificationcited by 1,311
  11. 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Rewardcited by 963
  12. 2021How Attentive are Graph Attention Networks?cited by 835
  13. 2019Heterogeneous Graph Attention Networkcited by 734
  14. 2023RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedbackcited by 625
  15. 2024GSM-Symbolic: Understanding the Limitations of Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 550
  16. 2019Label Propagation for Deep Semi-supervised Learningcited by 289
  17. 2023Magicoder: Empowering Code Generation with OSS-Instructcited by 256
  18. 2024Iterative Reasoning Preference Optimizationcited by 246
  19. 2023Reward Model Ensembles Help Mitigate Overoptimizationcited by 231
  20. 2020Combining Label Propagation and Simple Models Out-performs Graph Neural Networkscited by 202
  21. 2024Reward Generalization in RLHF: A Topological Perspectivecited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Memory-Based Advantage Shaping for LLM-Guided Reinforcement Learning
  2. 2025From Experience to Strategy: Empowering LLM Agents with Trainable Graph Memory
  3. 2025Response-Level Rewards Are All You Need for Online Reinforcement Learning in LLMs: A Mathematical Perspective
  4. 2026Gradients Know What Outcomes Don't: Unlocking Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoning with Gradient-Aligned Rewards
  5. 2026Fine-Mem: Fine-Grained Feedback Alignment for Long-Horizon Memory Management
  6. 2026Reinforcement Learning-based Semi-supervised Knowledge Distillation with LLM-as-a-Judge
  7. 2026MemBuilder: Reinforcing LLMs for Long-Term Memory Construction via Attributed Dense Rewards
  8. 2026Experience Augmented Policy Optimization for LLM Reasoning