mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Verifiable evaluations of machine learning models using zkSNARKs

arXiv 2402.02675 ↗First posted 5 Feb 2024cs.LG cs.AI cs.CRcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In a world of increasing closed-source commercial machine learning models, model evaluations from developers must be taken at face value. These benchmark results-whether over task accuracy, bias evaluations, or safety checks-are traditionally impossible to verify by a model end-user without the costly or impossible process of re-performing the benchmark on black-box model outputs. This work presents a method of verifiable model evaluation using model inference through zkSNARKs. The resulting zero-knowledge computational proofs of model outputs over datasets can be packaged into verifiable evaluation attestations showing that models with fixed private weights achieve stated performance or fairness metrics over public inputs. We present a flexible proving system that enables verifiable attestations to be performed on any standard neural network model with varying compute requirements. For the first time, we demonstrate this across a sample of real-world models and highlight key challenges and design solutions. This presents a new transparency paradigm in the verifiable evaluation of private models.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 92 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Feb 2024.

Builds on

39 of 92 references.

References · 39

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  3. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
  4. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  5. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
  6. 2020wav2vec 2.0: A Framework for Self-Supervised Learning of Speech Representationscited by 3,853
  7. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
  8. 2021Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsitycited by 3,014
  9. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  10. 2023A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Modelscited by 1,227
  11. 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,068
  12. 2020Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of "Bias" in NLPcited by 951
27 more
  1. 2021Dynabench: Rethinking Benchmarking in NLPcited by 447
  2. 2019On Measuring Social Biases in Sentence Encoderscited by 397
  3. 2021AI and the Everything in the Whole Wide World Benchmarkcited by 340
  4. 2020Improving Reproducibility in Machine Learning Research (A Report from the NeurIPS 2019 Reproducibility Program)cited by 318
  5. 2023How is ChatGPT's behavior changing over time?cited by 265
  6. 2021What Will it Take to Fix Benchmarking in Natural Language Understanding?cited by 200
  7. 2018Gazelle: A Low Latency Framework for Secure Neural Network Inferencecited by 193
  8. 2019A Framework for Understanding Sources of Harm throughout the Machine Learning Life Cyclecited by 192
  9. 2021Bias Out-of-the-Box: An Empirical Analysis of Intersectional Occupational Biases in Popular Generative Language Modelscited by 141
  10. 2019Predictive Biases in Natural Language Processing Models: A Conceptual Framework and Overviewcited by 137
  11. 2019Assessing Social and Intersectional Biases in Contextualized Word Representationscited by 134
  12. 2021CrypTen: Secure Multi-Party Computation Meets Machine Learningcited by 131
  13. 2018An Intersectional Definition of Fairnesscited by 126
  14. 2023Evaluating the Social Impact of Generative AI Systems in Systems and Societycited by 91
  15. 2021Proof-of-Learning: Definitions and Practicecited by 81
  16. 2017SafetyNets: Verifiable Execution of Deep Neural Networks on an Untrusted Cloudcited by 50
  17. 2022Scaling up Trustless DNN Inference with Zero-Knowledge Proofscited by 30
  18. 2018Understanding Unequal Gender Classification Accuracy from Face Imagescited by 25
  19. 2021HEMET: A Homomorphic-Encryption-Friendly Privacy-Preserving Mobile Neural Network Architecturecited by 24
  20. 2022Debiasing Methods for Fairer Neural Models in Vision and Language Research: A Surveycited by 22
  21. 2023Missing Information, Unresponsive Authors, Experimental Flaws: The Impossibility of Assessing the Reproducibility of Previous Human Evaluations in NLPcited by 21
  22. 2022pvCNN: Privacy-Preserving and Verifiable Convolutional Neural Network Testingcited by 20
  23. 2023zkDL: Efficient Zero-Knowledge Proofs of Deep Learning Trainingcited by 20
  24. 2023Reproducibility in Machine Learning-Driven Researchcited by 15
  25. 2023Reproducibility of Machine Learning: Terminology, Recommendations and Open Issuescited by 8
  26. 2023DeepReShape: Redesigning Neural Networks for Efficient Private Inferencecited by 8
  27. 2023FairCompass: Operationalising Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 7; 2026: 6.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Bits Under ZK-LLM: Evaluating Zero-Knowledge-Friendly Quantization for Verifiable Private LLM Inference
  2. 2026Jolt Atlas: Verifiable Inference via Lookup Arguments in Zero Knowledge
  3. 2026Do We Need Frontier Models to Verify Mathematical Proofs?
  4. 2026FUSE: Ensembling Verifiers with Zero Labeled Data
  5. 2023Towards Trustworthy and Aligned Machine Learning: A Data-centric Survey with Causality Perspectives
  6. 2026FormalProofBench: Can Models Write Graduate Level Math Proofs That Are Formally Verified?
  7. 2026Mask-Proof: An LLM-based Automated Data Curation Pipeline on Mathematical Proofs
  8. 2025Hard2Verify: A Step-Level Verification Benchmark for Open-Ended Frontier Math