mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Emojis Decoded: Leveraging ChatGPT for Enhanced Understanding in Social Media Communications

arXiv 2402.01681 ↗First posted 22 Jan 2024cs.CL cs.AIcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Emojis, which encapsulate semantics beyond mere words or phrases, have become prevalent in social network communications. This has spurred increasing scholarly interest in exploring their attributes and functionalities. However, emoji-related research and application face two primary challenges. First, researchers typically rely on crowd-sourcing to annotate emojis in order to understand their sentiments, usage intentions, and semantic meanings. Second, subjective interpretations by users can often lead to misunderstandings of emojis and cause the communication barrier. Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved significant success in various annotation tasks, with ChatGPT demonstrating expertise across multiple domains. In our study, we assess ChatGPT's effectiveness in handling previously annotated and downstream tasks. Our objective is to validate the hypothesis that ChatGPT can serve as a viable alternative to human annotators in emoji research and that its ability to explain emoji meanings can enhance clarity and transparency in online communications. Our findings indicate that ChatGPT has extensive knowledge of emojis. It is adept at elucidating the meaning of emojis across various application scenarios and demonstrates the potential to replace human annotators in a range of tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 73 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jan 2024.

Builds on

22 of 73 references.

References · 22

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  3. 2020Exploiting Cloze Questions for Few Shot Text Classification and Natural Language Inferencecited by 938
  4. 2023The Dawn of LMMs: Preliminary Explorations with GPT-4V(ision)cited by 681
  5. 2020TweetEval: Unified Benchmark and Comparative Evaluation for Tweet Classificationcited by 417
  6. 2021GPT3Mix: Leveraging Large-scale Language Models for Text Augmentationcited by 187
  7. 2023Is ChatGPT better than Human Annotators? Potential and Limitations of ChatGPT in Explaining Implicit Hate Speechcited by 166
  8. 2017Using millions of emoji occurrences to learn any-domain representations for detecting sentiment, emotion and sarcasmcited by 118
  9. 2023ChatGPT-4 Outperforms Experts and Crowd Workers in Annotating Political Twitter Messages with Zero-Shot Learningcited by 100
  10. 2024Mementos: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Model Reasoning over Image Sequencescited by 94
  11. 2023Explore Spurious Correlations at the Concept Level in Language Models for Text Classificationcited by 48
  12. 2023"HOT" ChatGPT: The promise of ChatGPT in detecting and discriminating hateful, offensive, and toxic comments on social mediacited by 45
10 more
  1. 2023Leveraging ChatGPT As Text Annotation Tool For Sentiment Analysiscited by 14
  2. 2017Spice up Your Chat: The Intentions and Sentiment Effects of Using Emojicited by 12
  3. 2023Scalable Prompt Generation for Semi-supervised Learning with Language Modelscited by 11
  4. 2018Emoji-Powered Representation Learning for Cross-Lingual Sentiment Classificationcited by 9
  5. 2020Using Noisy Self-Reports to Predict Twitter User Demographicscited by 8
  6. 2024Human vs. LMMs: Exploring the Discrepancy in Emoji Interpretation and Usage in Digital Communicationcited by 8
  7. 2023Emoji Promotes Developer Participation and Issue Resolution on GitHubcited by 6
  8. 2023EmojiLM: Modeling the New Emoji Languagecited by 6
  9. 2018A First Look at Emoji Usage on GitHub: An Empirical Studycited by 4
  10. 2021Emojis predict dropouts of remote workers: An empirical study of emoji usage on GitHubcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 3.

7 papers.