mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Semantics Preserving Emoji Recommendation with Large Language Models

arXiv 2409.10760 ↗First posted 16 Sep 2024cs.CL cs.SIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Emojis have become an integral part of digital communication, enriching text by conveying emotions, tone, and intent. Existing emoji recommendation methods are primarily evaluated based on their ability to match the exact emoji a user chooses in the original text. However, they ignore the essence of users' behavior on social media in that each text can correspond to multiple reasonable emojis. To better assess a model's ability to align with such real-world emoji usage, we propose a new semantics preserving evaluation framework for emoji recommendation, which measures a model's ability to recommend emojis that maintain the semantic consistency with the user's text. To evaluate how well a model preserves semantics, we assess whether the predicted affective state, demographic profile, and attitudinal stance of the user remain unchanged. If these attributes are preserved, we consider the recommended emojis to have maintained the original semantics. The advanced abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) in understanding and generating nuanced, contextually relevant output make them well-suited for handling the complexities of semantics preserving emoji recommendation. To this end, we construct a comprehensive benchmark to systematically assess the performance of six proprietary and open-source LLMs using different prompting techniques on our task. Our experiments demonstrate that GPT-4o outperforms other LLMs, achieving a semantics preservation score of 79.23%. Additionally, we conduct case studies to analyze model biases in downstream classification tasks and evaluate the diversity of the recommended emojis.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Sep 2024.

Builds on

21 of 43 references.

References · 21

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
  3. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  4. 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,164
  5. 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,120
  6. 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,998
  7. 2020BERTweet: A pre-trained language model for English Tweetscited by 346
  8. 2023Should ChatGPT be Biased? Challenges and Risks of Bias in Large Language Modelscited by 148
  9. 2017Using millions of emoji occurrences to learn any-domain representations for detecting sentiment, emotion and sarcasmcited by 118
  10. 2023Can ChatGPT Reproduce Human-Generated Labels? A Study of Social Computing Taskscited by 89
  11. 2017MojiTalk: Generating Emotional Responses at Scalecited by 64
  12. 2023SentimentGPT: Exploiting GPT for Advanced Sentiment Analysis and its Departure from Current Machine Learningcited by 38
9 more
  1. 2020Image Sentiment Transfercited by 11
  2. 2021Semi-automatic Generation of Multilingual Datasets for Stance Detection in Twittercited by 10
  3. 2024Human vs. LMMs: Exploring the Discrepancy in Emoji Interpretation and Usage in Digital Communicationcited by 8
  4. 2018Multimodal Emoji Predictioncited by 7
  5. 2024Emojis Decoded: Leveraging ChatGPT for Enhanced Understanding in Social Media Communicationscited by 7
  6. 2023EmojiLM: Modeling the New Emoji Languagecited by 6
  7. 2018Exploring Emoji Usage and Prediction Through a Temporal Variation Lenscited by 4
  8. 2016Neural Emoji Recommendation in Dialogue Systemscited by 3
  9. 2017A Semantics-Based Measure of Emoji Similaritycited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.