Gender Classification and Bias Mitigation in Facial Images
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Gender classification algorithms have important applications in many domains today such as demographic research, law enforcement, as well as human-computer interaction. Recent research showed that algorithms trained on biased benchmark databases could result in algorithmic bias. However, to date, little research has been carried out on gender classification algorithms' bias towards gender minorities subgroups, such as the LGBTQ and the non-binary population, who have distinct characteristics in gender expression. In this paper, we began by conducting surveys on existing benchmark databases for facial recognition and gender classification tasks. We discovered that the current benchmark databases lack representation of gender minority subgroups. We worked on extending the current binary gender classifier to include a non-binary gender class. We did that by assembling two new facial image databases: 1) a racially balanced inclusive database with a subset of LGBTQ population 2) an inclusive-gender database that consists of people with non-binary gender. We worked to increase classification accuracy and mitigate algorithmic biases on our baseline model trained on the augmented benchmark database. Our ensemble model has achieved an overall accuracy score of 90.39%, which is a 38.72% increase from the baseline binary gender classifier trained on Adience. While this is an initial attempt towards mitigating bias in gender classification, more work is needed in modeling gender as a continuum by assembling more inclusive databases.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Jul 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 2.
8 papers.
- 2021A Survey on Bias in Visual Datasetscited by 84
- 2024Survey of Bias In Text-to-Image Generation: Definition, Evaluation, and Mitigationcited by 66
- 2023'Person' == Light-skinned, Western Man, and Sexualization of Women of Color: Stereotypes in Stable Diffusioncited by 33
- 2022Rethinking Bias Mitigation: Fairer Architectures Make for Fairer Face Recognitioncited by 26
- 2023Auditing Gender Presentation Differences in Text-to-Image Modelscited by 22
- 2024Generalized People Diversity: Learning a Human Perception-Aligned Diversity Representation for People Imagescited by 6
- 2025Fairness through Feedback: Addressing Algorithmic Misgendering in Automatic Gender Recognitioncited by 0
- 2025Fairness Without Labels: Pseudo-Balancing for Bias Mitigation in Face Gender Classificationcited by 0
- 2025Fairness Without Labels: Pseudo-Balancing for Bias Mitigation in Face Gender Classification11 Oct 2025
- 2025Fairness through Feedback: Addressing Algorithmic Misgendering in Automatic Gender Recognition28 May 2025
- 2024Survey of Bias In Text-to-Image Generation: Definition, Evaluation, and Mitigation1 Apr 2024
- 2024Generalized People Diversity: Learning a Human Perception-Aligned Diversity Representation for People Images25 Jan 2024
- 2023'Person' == Light-skinned, Western Man, and Sexualization of Women of Color: Stereotypes in Stable Diffusion30 Oct 2023
- 2023Auditing Gender Presentation Differences in Text-to-Image Models7 Feb 2023
- 2022Rethinking Bias Mitigation: Fairer Architectures Make for Fairer Face Recognition18 Oct 2022
- 2021A Survey on Bias in Visual Datasets16 Jul 2021