mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Novel Benchmark for Few-Shot Semantic Segmentation in the Era of Foundation Models

arXiv 2401.11311 ↗First posted 20 Jan 2024cs.CVcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Few-shot semantic segmentation (FSS) is a crucial challenge in computer vision, driving extensive research into a diverse range of methods, from advanced meta-learning techniques to simple transfer learning baselines. With the emergence of vision foundation models (VFM) serving as generalist feature extractors, we seek to explore the adaptation of these models for FSS. While current FSS benchmarks focus on adapting pre-trained models to new tasks with few images, they emphasize in-domain generalization, making them less suitable for VFM trained on large-scale web datasets. To address this, we propose a novel realistic benchmark with a simple and straightforward adaptation process tailored for this task. Using this benchmark, we conduct a comprehensive comparative analysis of prominent VFM and semantic segmentation models. To evaluate their effectiveness, we leverage various adaption methods, ranging from linear probing to parameter efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) and full fine-tuning. Our findings show that models designed for segmentation can be outperformed by self-supervised (SSL) models. On the other hand, while PEFT methods yields competitive performance, they provide little discrepancy in the obtained results compared to other methods, highlighting the critical role of the feature extractor in determining results. To our knowledge, this is the first study on the adaptation of VFM for FSS.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 56 of its 83 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jan 2024.

Builds on

56 of 83 references.

References · 56

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  3. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  4. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  5. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  6. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  7. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
  8. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
  9. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
  10. 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,861
  11. 2014Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 4,845
  12. 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,427
38 more
  1. 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,131
  2. 2017Prototypical Networks for Few-shot Learningcited by 3,001
  3. 2021SegFormer: Simple and Efficient Design for Semantic Segmentation with Transformerscited by 2,923
  4. 2021Learning to Prompt for Vision-Language Modelscited by 2,269
  5. 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,261
  6. 2016Matching Networks for One Shot Learningcited by 2,246
  7. 2022Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 1,674
  8. 2021BitFit: Simple Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning for Transformer-based Masked Language-modelscited by 1,234
  9. 2022Reproducible scaling laws for contrastive language-image learningcited by 1,163
  10. 2016Semantic Understanding of Scenes through the ADE20K Datasetcited by 1,063
  11. 2021iBOT: Image BERT Pre-Training with Online Tokenizercited by 891
  12. 2021Segmenter: Transformer for Semantic Segmentationcited by 855
  13. 2022AdaptFormer: Adapting Vision Transformers for Scalable Visual Recognitioncited by 714
  14. 2021Do Vision Transformers See Like Convolutional Neural Networks?cited by 671
  15. 2020Image Segmentation Using Deep Learning: A Surveycited by 659
  16. 2020Rethinking Few-Shot Image Classification: a Good Embedding Is All You Need?cited by 435
  17. 2017One-Shot Learning for Semantic Segmentationcited by 337
  18. 2019Meta-Dataset: A Dataset of Datasets for Learning to Learn from Few Examplescited by 312
  19. 2017Meta Networkscited by 268
  20. 2023Convolutions Die Hard: Open-Vocabulary Segmentation with Single Frozen Convolutional CLIPcited by 199
  21. 2019Feature Weighting and Boosting for Few-Shot Segmentationcited by 189
  22. 2023Matcher: Segment Anything with One Shot Using All-Purpose Feature Matchingcited by 142
  23. 2022Cost Aggregation with 4D Convolutional Swin Transformer for Few-Shot Segmentationcited by 114
  24. 2020Adversarial Feature Hallucination Networks for Few-Shot Learningcited by 110
  25. 2023What Do Self-Supervised Vision Transformers Learn?cited by 90
  26. 2021Cross-domain Few-shot Learning with Task-specific Adapterscited by 79
  27. 2021Mining Latent Classes for Few-shot Segmentationcited by 69
  28. 2023The effectiveness of MAE pre-pretraining for billion-scale pretrainingcited by 68
  29. 2021Universal Representation Learning from Multiple Domains for Few-shot Classificationcited by 56
  30. 2021Learning Meta-class Memory for Few-Shot Semantic Segmentationcited by 56
  31. 2022Singular Value Fine-tuning: Few-shot Segmentation requires Few-parameters Fine-tuningcited by 50
  32. 2023A Closer Look at Few-shot Classification Againcited by 46
  33. 2022PP-LiteSeg: A Superior Real-Time Semantic Segmentation Modelcited by 33
  34. 2023Using DUCK-Net for Polyp Image Segmentationcited by 30
  35. 2024Cross-Domain Few-Shot Segmentation via Iterative Support-Query Correspondence Miningcited by 30
  36. 2022Interclass Prototype Relation for Few-Shot Segmentationcited by 25
  37. 2021Meta Navigator: Search for a Good Adaptation Policy for Few-shot Learningcited by 19
  38. 2023Visual and Textual Prior Guided Mask Assemble for Few-Shot Segmentation and Beyondcited by 19

50 most cited of 56 All 56 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 7; 2025: 3; 2026: 3.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: