Sample-Efficient Linear Representation Learning from Non-IID Non-Isotropic Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A powerful concept behind much of the recent progress in machine learning is the extraction of common features across data from heterogeneous sources or tasks. Intuitively, using all of one's data to learn a common representation function benefits both computational effort and statistical generalization by leaving a smaller number of parameters to fine-tune on a given task. Toward theoretically grounding these merits, we propose a general setting of recovering linear operators M from noisy vector measurements y = Mx + w, where the covariates x may be both non-i.i.d. and non-isotropic. We demonstrate that existing isotropy-agnostic representation learning approaches incur biases on the representation update, which causes the scaling of the noise terms to lose favorable dependence on the number of source tasks. This in turn can cause the sample complexity of representation learning to be bottlenecked by the single-task data size. We introduce an adaptation, textttDe-bias & Feature-Whiten (textttDFW), of the popular alternating minimization-descent scheme proposed independently in Collins et al., (2021) and Nayer and Vaswani (2022), and establish linear convergence to the optimal representation with noise level scaling down with the textittotal source data size. This leads to generalization bounds on the same order as an oracle empirical risk minimizer. We verify the vital importance of textttDFW on various numerical simulations. In particular, we show that vanilla alternating-minimization descent fails catastrophically even for iid, but mildly non-isotropic data. Our analysis unifies and generalizes prior work, and provides a flexible framework for a wider range of applications, such as in controls and dynamical systems.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 42 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Aug 2023.
Builds on
42 of 60 references.
References · 42
- 2021Exploiting Shared Representations for Personalized Federated Learningcited by 537
- 2017Distral: Robust Multitask Reinforcement Learningcited by 231
- 2020Few-Shot Learning via Learning the Representation, Provablycited by 213
- 2018Global Convergence of Policy Gradient Methods for the Linear Quadratic Regulatorcited by 211
- 2015The Benefit of Multitask Representation Learningcited by 194
- 2020Provable Meta-Learning of Linear Representationscited by 161
- 2018Learning Without Mixing: Towards A Sharp Analysis of Linear System Identificationcited by 158
- 2017On the Sample Complexity of the Linear Quadratic Regulatorcited by 151
- 2018Multi-task Deep Reinforcement Learning with PopArtcited by 138
- 2018A Tour of Reinforcement Learning: The View from Continuous Controlcited by 129
- 2020Naive Exploration is Optimal for Online LQRcited by 111
- 2019Online Control with Adversarial Disturbancescited by 92
30 more
- 2018Regret Bounds for Robust Adaptive Control of the Linear Quadratic Regulatorcited by 86
- 2019Logarithmic Regret for Online Controlcited by 38
- 2021Adaptive-Control-Oriented Meta-Learning for Nonlinear Systemscited by 38
- 2018The Gap Between Model-Based and Model-Free Methods on the Linear Quadratic Regulator: An Asymptotic Viewpointcited by 36
- 2021On the Power of Multitask Representation Learning in Linear MDPcited by 30
- 2022Provable Benefit of Multitask Representation Learning in Reinforcement Learningcited by 29
- 2017Least-Squares Temporal Difference Learning for the Linear Quadratic Regulatorcited by 27
- 2020Finite-time Identification of Stable Linear Systems: Optimality of the Least-Squares Estimatorcited by 26
- 2021Sample Efficient Linear Meta-Learning by Alternating Minimizationcited by 25
- 2022Learning from many trajectoriescited by 24
- 2021Meta-Adaptive Nonlinear Control: Theory and Algorithmscited by 23
- 2022Multi-Task Imitation Learning for Linear Dynamical Systemscited by 22
- 2020Scalable Multi-Task Imitation Learning with Autonomous Improvementcited by 21
- 2021Near-optimal Offline and Streaming Algorithms for Learning Non-Linear Dynamical Systemscited by 17
- 2021Joint Learning of Linear Time-Invariant Dynamical Systemscited by 16
- 2019Finite-time Analysis of Approximate Policy Iteration for the Linear Quadratic Regulatorcited by 15
- 2022FedSysID: A Federated Approach to Sample-Efficient System Identificationcited by 15
- 2023Provable Multi-Task Representation Learning by Two-Layer ReLU Neural Networkscited by 15
- 2021A Representation Learning Perspective on the Importance of Train-Validation Splitting in Meta-Learningcited by 12
- 2022Regret Lower Bounds for Learning Linear Quadratic Gaussian Systemscited by 11
- 2022Learning to Control Linear Systems can be Hardcited by 10
- 2023Learning Dynamical Systems by Leveraging Data from Similar Systemscited by 8
- 2023Nonlinear Meta-Learning Can Guarantee Faster Ratescited by 8
- 2022How are policy gradient methods affected by the limits of control?cited by 6
- 2023Multi-Task System Identification of Similar Linear Time-Invariant Dynamical Systemscited by 6
- 2023Imitation and Transfer Learning for LQG Controlcited by 6
- 2022Meta-Learning Online Control for Linear Dynamical Systemscited by 5
- 2022Data-based Transfer Stabilization in Linear Systemscited by 5
- 2022Joint Learning-Based Stabilization of Multiple Unknown Linear Systemscited by 3
- 2023The Fundamental Limitations of Learning Linear-Quadratic Regulatorscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 6; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.
12 papers.
- 2024Meta-Learning Linear Quadratic Regulators: A Policy Gradient MAML Approach for Model-free LQRcited by 14
- 2024Federated Representation Learning in the Under-Parameterized Regimecited by 7
- 2023Nonasymptotic Regret Analysis of Adaptive Linear Quadratic Control with Model Misspecificationcited by 6
- 2024Regret Analysis of Multi-task Representation Learning for Linear-Quadratic Adaptive Controlcited by 4
- 2025Learning Stabilizing Policies via an Unstable Subspace Representationcited by 3
- 2024Latent Linear Quadratic Regulator for Robotic Control Taskscited by 1
- 2024Guarantees for Nonlinear Representation Learning: Non-identical Covariates, Dependent Data, Fewer Samplescited by 1
- 2024Learning with Shared Representations: Statistical Rates and Efficient Algorithmscited by 0
- 2025How Does Preconditioning Guide Feature Learning in Deep Neural Networks?cited by 0
- 2025Adversarially Robust Multitask Adaptive Controlcited by 0
- 2026On the Power of Source Screening for Learning Shared Feature Extractorscited by 0
- 2026Feed m Birds with One Scone: Accelerating Multi-task Gradient Balancing via Bi-level Optimizationcited by 0
- 2026Feed m Birds with One Scone: Accelerating Multi-task Gradient Balancing via Bi-level Optimization8 Mar 2026
- 2026On the Power of Source Screening for Learning Shared Feature Extractors18 Feb 2026
- 2025Adversarially Robust Multitask Adaptive Control7 Nov 2025
- 2025How Does Preconditioning Guide Feature Learning in Deep Neural Networks?30 Sep 2025
- 2025Learning Stabilizing Policies via an Unstable Subspace Representation2 May 2025
- 2024Guarantees for Nonlinear Representation Learning: Non-identical Covariates, Dependent Data, Fewer Samples15 Oct 2024
- 2024Learning with Shared Representations: Statistical Rates and Efficient Algorithms7 Sep 2024
- 2024Latent Linear Quadratic Regulator for Robotic Control Tasks15 Jul 2024
- 2024Regret Analysis of Multi-task Representation Learning for Linear-Quadratic Adaptive Control8 Jul 2024
- 2024Federated Representation Learning in the Under-Parameterized Regime7 Jun 2024
- 2024Meta-Learning Linear Quadratic Regulators: A Policy Gradient MAML Approach for Model-free LQR25 Jan 2024
- 2023Nonasymptotic Regret Analysis of Adaptive Linear Quadratic Control with Model Misspecification29 Dec 2023