Learning to Stabilize Unknown LTI Systems on a Single Trajectory under Stochastic Noise
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study the problem of learning to stabilize unknown noisy Linear Time-Invariant (LTI) systems on a single trajectory. It is well known in the literature that the learn-to-stabilize problem suffers from exponential blow-up in which the state norm blows up in the order of Theta(2n) where n is the state space dimension. This blow-up is due to the open-loop instability when exploring the n-dimensional state space. To address this issue, we develop a novel algorithm that decouples the unstable subspace of the LTI system from the stable subspace, based on which the algorithm only explores and stabilizes the unstable subspace, the dimension of which can be much smaller than n. With a new singular-value-decomposition(SVD)-based analytical framework, we prove that the system is stabilized before the state norm reaches 2O(k log n), where k is the dimension of the unstable subspace. Critically, this bound avoids exponential blow-up in state dimension in the order of Theta(2n) as in the previous works, and to the best of our knowledge, this is the first paper to avoid exponential blow-up in dimension for stabilizing LTI systems with noise.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 May 2024.
Builds on
22 of 44 references.
References · 22
- 2018Global Convergence of Policy Gradient Methods for the Linear Quadratic Regulatorcited by 250
- 2017On the Sample Complexity of the Linear Quadratic Regulatorcited by 159
- 2018Learning Without Mixing: Towards A Sharp Analysis of Linear System Identificationcited by 158
- 2018Near optimal finite time identification of arbitrary linear dynamical systemscited by 89
- 2018Non-asymptotic Identification of LTI Systems from a Single Trajectorycited by 78
- 2019Learning Linear-Quadratic Regulators Efficiently with only √T Regretcited by 70
- 2019Formulas for Data-driven Control: Stabilization, Optimality and Robustnesscited by 47
- 2020Black-Box Control for Linear Dynamical Systemscited by 43
- 2018The Gap Between Model-Based and Model-Free Methods on the Linear Quadratic Regulator: An Asymptotic Viewpointcited by 40
- 2019Distributed Reinforcement Learning for Decentralized Linear Quadratic Control: A Derivative-Free Policy Optimization Approachcited by 38
- 2020Non-asymptotic Identification of Linear Dynamical Systems Using Multiple Trajectoriescited by 38
- 2019Data-Driven Model Predictive Control with Stability and Robustness Guaranteescited by 26
10 more
- 2021Stabilizing Dynamical Systems via Policy Gradient Methodscited by 25
- 2019Finite-time Analysis of Approximate Policy Iteration for the Linear Quadratic Regulatorcited by 23
- 2021Linear Systems can be Hard to Learncited by 20
- 2013Efficient Reinforcement Learning for High Dimensional Linear Quadratic Systemscited by 13
- 2020Geometric Exploration for Online Controlcited by 9
- 2022On the Sample Complexity of Stabilizing LTI Systems on a Single Trajectorycited by 7
- 2020Policy Learning of MDPs with Mixed Continuous/Discrete Variables: A Case Study on Model-Free Control of Markovian Jump Systemscited by 6
- 2023Nonasymptotic Regret Analysis of Adaptive Linear Quadratic Control with Model Misspecificationcited by 6
- 2021Identification of Linear Systems with Multiplicative Noise from Multiple Trajectory Datacited by 2
- 2023Robust Control of Unknown Switched Linear Systems from Noisy Datacited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.