mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Regret Analysis of Multi-task Representation Learning for Linear-Quadratic Adaptive Control

arXiv 2407.05781 ↗First posted 8 Jul 2024cs.LG cs.SY eess.SYcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Representation learning is a powerful tool that enables learning over large multitudes of agents or domains by enforcing that all agents operate on a shared set of learned features. However, many robotics or controls applications that would benefit from collaboration operate in settings with changing environments and goals, whereas most guarantees for representation learning are stated for static settings. Toward rigorously establishing the benefit of representation learning in dynamic settings, we analyze the regret of multi-task representation learning for linear-quadratic control. This setting introduces unique challenges. Firstly, we must account for and balance the textitmisspecification introduced by an approximate representation. Secondly, we cannot rely on the parameter update schemes of single-task online LQR, for which least-squares often suffices, and must devise a novel scheme to ensure sufficient improvement. We demonstrate that for settings where exploration is "benign", the regret of any agent after T timesteps scales as tilde O(√T/H), where H is the number of agents. In settings with "difficult" exploration, the regret scales as tilde O(√du dθ √T + T3/4/H1/5), where dx is the state-space dimension, du is the input dimension, and dθ is the task-specific parameter count. In both cases, by comparing to the minimax single-task regret O(√dx du2√T), we see a benefit of a large number of agents. Notably, in the difficult exploration case, by sharing a representation across tasks, the effective task-specific parameter count can often be small dθ < dx du. Lastly, we provide numerical validation of the trends we predict.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jul 2024.

Builds on

28 of 40 references.

References · 28

  1. 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,861
  2. 2023RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Controlcited by 2,993
  3. 2022RT-1: Robotics Transformer for Real-World Control at Scalecited by 2,007
  4. 2021Exploiting Shared Representations for Personalized Federated Learningcited by 537
  5. 2021FedProto: Federated Prototype Learning across Heterogeneous Clientscited by 349
  6. 2023RVT: Robotic View Transformer for 3D Object Manipulationcited by 224
  7. 2020Few-Shot Learning via Learning the Representation, Provablycited by 213
  8. 2020On the Theory of Transfer Learning: The Importance of Task Diversitycited by 186
  9. 2020Provable Meta-Learning of Linear Representationscited by 161
  10. 2020Naive Exploration is Optimal for Online LQRcited by 111
  11. 2018Regret Bounds for Robust Adaptive Control of the Linear Quadratic Regulatorcited by 86
  12. 2020Improper Learning for Non-Stochastic Controlcited by 83
16 more
  1. 2022Pre-Training for Robots: Offline RL Enables Learning New Tasks from a Handful of Trialscited by 78
  2. 2019Learning Linear-Quadratic Regulators Efficiently with only √T Regretcited by 67
  3. 2019The Nonstochastic Control Problemcited by 52
  4. 2020Logarithmic Regret for Learning Linear Quadratic Regulators Efficientlycited by 33
  5. 2023A Tutorial on the Non-Asymptotic Theory of System Identificationcited by 26
  6. 2020Regret Bounds for Adaptive Nonlinear Controlcited by 25
  7. 2021Sample Efficient Linear Meta-Learning by Alternating Minimizationcited by 25
  8. 2022Multi-Task Imitation Learning for Linear Dynamical Systemscited by 22
  9. 2023Model-free Learning with Heterogeneous Dynamical Systems: A Federated LQR Approachcited by 19
  10. 2021Joint Learning of Linear Time-Invariant Dynamical Systemscited by 16
  11. 2024Meta-Learning Linear Quadratic Regulators: A Policy Gradient MAML Approach for Model-free LQRcited by 14
  12. 2021Minimal Expected Regret in Linear Quadratic Controlcited by 13
  13. 2023Sample-Efficient Linear Representation Learning from Non-IID Non-Isotropic Datacited by 12
  14. 2023Imitation and Transfer Learning for LQG Controlcited by 6
  15. 2023Nonasymptotic Regret Analysis of Adaptive Linear Quadratic Control with Model Misspecificationcited by 6
  16. 2021Robust Online Control with Model Misspecificationcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4.

4 papers.