mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Faithful Model Explanations through Energy-Constrained Conformal Counterfactuals

arXiv 2312.10648 ↗First posted 17 Dec 2023cs.LG cs.AIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Counterfactual explanations offer an intuitive and straightforward way to explain black-box models and offer algorithmic recourse to individuals. To address the need for plausible explanations, existing work has primarily relied on surrogate models to learn how the input data is distributed. This effectively reallocates the task of learning realistic explanations for the data from the model itself to the surrogate. Consequently, the generated explanations may seem plausible to humans but need not necessarily describe the behaviour of the black-box model faithfully. We formalise this notion of faithfulness through the introduction of a tailored evaluation metric and propose a novel algorithmic framework for generating Energy-Constrained Conformal Counterfactuals that are only as plausible as the model permits. Through extensive empirical studies, we demonstrate that ECCCo reconciles the need for faithfulness and plausibility. In particular, we show that for models with gradient access, it is possible to achieve state-of-the-art performance without the need for surrogate models. To do so, our framework relies solely on properties defining the black-box model itself by leveraging recent advances in energy-based modelling and conformal prediction. To our knowledge, this is the first venture in this direction for generating faithful counterfactual explanations. Thus, we anticipate that ECCCo can serve as a baseline for future research. We believe that our work opens avenues for researchers and practitioners seeking tools to better distinguish trustworthy from unreliable models.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Dec 2023.

Builds on

25 of 37 references.

References · 25

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  3. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  4. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
  5. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
  6. 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,086
  7. 2021A Gentle Introduction to Conformal Prediction and Distribution-Free Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 777
  8. 2019Your Classifier is Secretly an Energy Based Model and You Should Treat it Like Onecited by 402
  9. 2018Explanations based on the Missing: Towards Contrastive Explanations with Pertinent Negativescited by 261
  10. 2020Algorithmic Recourse: from Counterfactual Explanations to Interventionscited by 250
  11. 2019FACE: Feasible and Actionable Counterfactual Explanationscited by 232
  12. 2020Counterfactual Explanations and Algorithmic Recourses for Machine Learning: A Reviewcited by 174
13 more
  1. 2019Preserving Causal Constraints in Counterfactual Explanations for Machine Learning Classifierscited by 143
  2. 2019Towards Realistic Individual Recourse and Actionable Explanations in Black-Box Decision Making Systemscited by 128
  3. 2020A survey of algorithmic recourse: definitions, formulations, solutions, and prospectscited by 118
  4. 2021Counterfactual Explanations Can Be Manipulatedcited by 113
  5. 2021Learning Optimal Conformal Classifierscited by 108
  6. 2021Towards Robust and Reliable Algorithmic Recoursecited by 101
  7. 2021CARLA: A Python Library to Benchmark Algorithmic Recourse and Counterfactual Explanation Algorithmscited by 85
  8. 2020The Case for Bayesian Deep Learningcited by 68
  9. 2021Evaluating Robustness of Counterfactual Explanationscited by 41
  10. 2021Generating Interpretable Counterfactual Explanations By Implicit Minimisation of Epistemic and Aleatoric Uncertaintiescited by 41
  11. 2022Probabilistically Robust Recourse: Navigating the Trade-offs between Costs and Robustness in Algorithmic Recoursecited by 40
  12. 2021Counterfactual Explanations for Arbitrary Regression Modelscited by 22
  13. 2023Explaining Black-Box Models through Counterfactualscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

5 papers.