mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

When Modalities Fail to Tango: Conformal Backdoor Detection in Multimodal Contrastive Learning

arXiv 2608.04052 ↗First posted 4 Aug 2026cs.CR cs.CV cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: LLM safety and security → Backdoor and data poisoning attacks

Abstract (arXiv)

Backdoor attacks in multimodal contrastive learning (MCL) have garnered growing attention in recent years, as many downstream tasks critically depend on pre-trained MCL models. Existing detection-based defenses predominantly rely on the CLIPScore metric, under the assumption that poisoned pairs exhibit lower semantic similarity between the image and the caption. However, we identify two critical flaws remaining in existing methods: (1) the substantial overlap between CLIPScore distributions of benign and poisoned pairs undermines the reliability of this metric, and (2) fixed-threshold detection cannot provide statistical guarantees for ambiguous samples within overlapping regions. To overcome these limitations, we propose integrating conformal prediction (CP), a statistical framework that quantifies uncertainty through nonconformity scores (NCSs), to establish provable confidence bounds for detecting poisoned image-caption pairs. Building on CP, we introduce CASCADE, a novel two-stage Coarse-to-Fine Conformal Backdoor Detection framework. The coarse-grained stage uses cross-modality consistency to identify high-confidence benign and poisoned pairs. In the fine-grained stage, a reference set is constructed from high-confidence poisoned pairs, and instance-level NCSs based on text-space similarity are computed for each sample in the unidentified subset. These NCSs measure conformity to the poisoning distribution and enable precise identification of latent poisoned pairs within the unidentified subset. Extensive experiments on the large-scale CC3M dataset demonstrate that CASCADE achieves an average FPR of 5.79% at 100% TPR and an average AUROC of 0.9867 across diverse attacks, while remaining effective against adaptive attacks.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Backdoor and data poisoning attacks, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 36 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Aug 2026.

Builds on

36 of 67 references.

Closest ancestors · 7

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Detecting Backdoor Samples in Contrastive Language Image Pretraining3 Feb
  2. 2024Efficient Backdoor Defense in Multimodal Contrastive Learning: A Token-Level Unlearning Method for Mitigating Threats29 Sep
  3. 2024CleanerCLIP: Fine-grained Counterfactual Semantic Augmentation for Backdoor Defense in Contrastive Learning26 Sep
  4. 2023BadCLIP: Dual-Embedding Guided Backdoor Attack on Multimodal Contrastive Learning20 Nov
  5. 2023Better Safe than Sorry: Pre-training CLIP against Targeted Data Poisoning and Backdoor Attacks5 Oct
  6. 2023BAGM: A Backdoor Attack for Manipulating Text-to-Image Generative Models31 Jul
  7. 2023Robust Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training against Data Poisoning and Backdoor Attacks13 Mar

Other references · 29

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  3. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  4. 2016Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotationscited by 2,646
  5. 2020Oscar: Object-Semantics Aligned Pre-training for Vision-Language Taskscited by 1,213
  6. 2017Targeted Backdoor Attacks on Deep Learning Systems Using Data Poisoningcited by 1,012
  7. 2022When and why vision-language models behave like bags-of-words, and what to do about it?cited by 603
  8. 2021ClipCap: CLIP Prefix for Image Captioningcited by 557
  9. 2021SLIP: Self-supervision meets Language-Image Pre-trainingcited by 434
  10. 2021Supervision Exists Everywhere: A Data Efficient Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training Paradigmcited by 405
  11. 2020Invisible Backdoor Attack with Sample-Specific Triggerscited by 338
  12. 2019Label-Consistent Backdoor Attackscited by 285
17 more
  1. 2023Poisoning Web-Scale Training Datasets is Practicalcited by 276
  2. 2021Anti-Backdoor Learning: Training Clean Models on Poisoned Datacited by 258
  3. 2019A new Backdoor Attack in CNNs by training set corruption without label poisoningcited by 237
  4. 2022SmallCap: Lightweight Image Captioning Prompted with Retrieval Augmentationcited by 82
  5. 2022Data Poisoning Attacks Against Multimodal Encoderscited by 41
  6. 2023Backdoor Attack with Sparse and Invisible Triggercited by 20
  7. 2023CBD: A Certified Backdoor Detector Based on Local Dominant Probabilitycited by 13
  8. 2023Rethinking Image Forgery Detection via Soft Contrastive Learning and Unsupervised Clusteringcited by 12
  9. 2024DAT: Improving Adversarial Robustness via Generative Amplitude Mix-up in Frequency Domaincited by 12
  10. 2025Robust Conformal Outlier Detection under Contaminated Reference Datacited by 12
  11. 2023Progressive Poisoned Data Isolation for Training-time Backdoor Defensecited by 10
  12. 2023Regroup Median Loss for Combating Label Noisecited by 8
  13. 2023Effective Ambiguity Attack Against Passport-based DNN Intellectual Property Protection Schemes through Fully Connected Layer Substitutioncited by 7
  14. 2023Universal Detection of Backdoor Attacks via Density-based Clustering and Centroids Analysiscited by 5
  15. 2025FontGuard: A Robust Font Watermarking Approach Leveraging Deep Font Knowledgecited by 3
  16. 2026AEGIS: Adversarial Target-Guided Retention-Data-Free Robust Concept Erasure from Diffusion Modelscited by 3
  17. 2026SEED: Simple ViT and Evolving Harness for Explainable Text Forgery Detectioncited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.