mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

FRAPPE: A Group Fairness Framework for Post-Processing Everything

arXiv 2312.02592 ↗First posted 5 Dec 2023cs.LG cs.CYcited by 16

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Despite achieving promising fairness-error trade-offs, in-processing mitigation techniques for group fairness cannot be employed in numerous practical applications with limited computation resources or no access to the training pipeline of the prediction model. In these situations, post-processing is a viable alternative. However, current methods are tailored to specific problem settings and fairness definitions and hence, are not as broadly applicable as in-processing. In this work, we propose a framework that turns any regularized in-processing method into a post-processing approach. This procedure prescribes a way to obtain post-processing techniques for a much broader range of problem settings than the prior post-processing literature. We show theoretically and through extensive experiments that our framework preserves the good fairness-error trade-offs achieved with in-processing and can improve over the effectiveness of prior post-processing methods. Finally, we demonstrate several advantages of a modular mitigation strategy that disentangles the training of the prediction model from the fairness mitigation, including better performance on tasks with partial group labels.

Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 58 of its 102 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Dec 2023.

Builds on

58 of 102 references.

References · 58

  1. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  2. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  3. 2019Learning Imbalanced Datasets with Label-Distribution-Aware Margin Losscited by 987
  4. 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
  5. 2020Long-tail learning via logit adjustmentcited by 605
  6. 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 585
  7. 2021Just Train Twice: Improving Group Robustness without Training Group Informationcited by 522
  8. 2021Retiring Adult: New Datasets for Fair Machine Learningcited by 443
  9. 2019Unlabeled Data Improves Adversarial Robustnesscited by 415
  10. 2017On Fairness and Calibrationcited by 406
  11. 2017Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairnesscited by 402
  12. 2019AutoML: A Survey of the State-of-the-Artcited by 388
38 more
  1. 2020Fairness in Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 369
  2. 2018Fairness Without Demographics in Repeated Loss Minimizationcited by 363
  3. 2018Learning Adversarially Fair and Transferable Representationscited by 353
  4. 2019Verified Uncertainty Calibrationcited by 307
  5. 2018Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?cited by 262
  6. 2020Fairness without Demographics through Adversarially Reweighted Learningcited by 251
  7. 2018Empirical Risk Minimization under Fairness Constraintscited by 226
  8. 2015Cost Sensitive Learning of Deep Feature Representations from Imbalanced Datacited by 167
  9. 2020Understanding and Mitigating the Tradeoff Between Robustness and Accuracycited by 148
  10. 2018Classification with Fairness Constraints: A Meta-Algorithm with Provable Guaranteescited by 146
  11. 2019Inherent Tradeoffs in Learning Fair Representationscited by 144
  12. 2018Why Is My Classifier Discriminatory?cited by 143
  13. 2019Wasserstein Fair Classificationcited by 131
  14. 2022Bias Mitigation for Machine Learning Classifiers: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 125
  15. 2018Optimization with Non-Differentiable Constraints with Applications to Fairness, Recall, Churn, and Other Goalscited by 103
  16. 2018Fairness Under Unawareness: Assessing Disparity When Protected Class Is Unobservedcited by 94
  17. 2022Spread Spurious Attribute: Improving Worst-group Accuracy with Spurious Attribute Estimationcited by 88
  18. 2019Assessing Algorithmic Fairness with Unobserved Protected Class Using Data Combinationcited by 79
  19. 2019Putting Fairness Principles into Practice: Challenges, Metrics, and Improvementscited by 70
  20. 2019Operationalizing Individual Fairness with Pairwise Fair Representationscited by 64
  21. 2021It's COMPASlicated: The Messy Relationship between RAI Datasets and Algorithmic Fairness Benchmarkscited by 61
  22. 2019Leveraging Labeled and Unlabeled Data for Consistent Fair Binary Classificationcited by 60
  23. 2023Towards Last-layer Retraining for Group Robustness with Fewer Annotationscited by 54
  24. 2022Fair and Optimal Classification via Post-Processingcited by 50
  25. 2018Fairness Under Compositioncited by 43
  26. 2021Learning Fair Classifiers with Partially Annotated Group Labelscited by 40
  27. 2017Fair Kernel Learningcited by 39
  28. 2019Toward a better trade-off between performance and fairness with kernel-based distribution matchingcited by 36
  29. 2019R'enyi Fair Inferencecited by 33
  30. 2021Evaluating Fairness of Machine Learning Models Under Uncertain and Incomplete Informationcited by 33
  31. 2021Fairness in Ranking: A Surveycited by 33
  32. 2022Fairness Reprogrammingcited by 33
  33. 2021A Stochastic Optimization Framework for Fair Risk Minimizationcited by 26
  34. 2021BARACK: Partially Supervised Group Robustness With Guaranteescited by 25
  35. 2022FairGBM: Gradient Boosting with Fairness Constraintscited by 25
  36. 2021Fairness without Imputation: A Decision Tree Approach for Fair Prediction with Missing Valuescited by 24
  37. 2022How Robust is Unsupervised Representation Learning to Distribution Shift?cited by 24
  38. 2022How unfair is private learning ?cited by 18

50 most cited of 58 All 58 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 6; 2025: 4; 2026: 6.

16 papers.

Sort:

By area: