mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Multi-Output Distributional Fairness via Post-Processing

arXiv 2409.00553 ↗First posted 31 Aug 2024cs.LG cs.AI cs.CYcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The post-processing approaches are becoming prominent techniques to enhance machine learning models' fairness because of their intuitiveness, low computational cost, and excellent scalability. However, most existing post-processing methods are designed for task-specific fairness measures and are limited to single-output models. In this paper, we introduce a post-processing method for multi-output models, such as the ones used for multi-task/multi-class classification and representation learning, to enhance a model's distributional parity, a task-agnostic fairness measure. Existing methods for achieving distributional parity rely on the (inverse) cumulative density function of a model's output, restricting their applicability to single-output models. Extending previous works, we propose to employ optimal transport mappings to move a model's outputs across different groups towards their empirical Wasserstein barycenter. An approximation technique is applied to reduce the complexity of computing the exact barycenter and a kernel regression method is proposed to extend this process to out-of-sample data. Our empirical studies evaluate the proposed approach against various baselines on multi-task/multi-class classification and representation learning tasks, demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 52 of its 79 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Aug 2024.

Builds on

52 of 79 references.

References · 52

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  3. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
  4. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,693
  5. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
  6. 2019CheXpert: A Large Chest Radiograph Dataset with Uncertainty Labels and Expert Comparisoncited by 1,423
  7. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,312
  8. 2018Computational Optimal Transportcited by 780
  9. 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
  10. 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 587
  11. 2017Age Progression/Regression by Conditional Adversarial Autoencodercited by 429
  12. 2017Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairnesscited by 403
38 more
  1. 2018Learning Adversarially Fair and Transferable Representationscited by 353
  2. 2018Learning Not to Learn: Training Deep Neural Networks with Biased Datacited by 255
  3. 2015The Variational Fair Autoencodercited by 223
  4. 2019Fair Regression: Quantitative Definitions and Reduction-based Algorithmscited by 168
  5. 2017Data Decisions and Theoretical Implications when Adversarially Learning Fair Representationscited by 165
  6. 2019Wasserstein Fair Classificationcited by 131
  7. 2017Controllable Invariance through Adversarial Feature Learningcited by 127
  8. 2020Fair Attribute Classification through Latent Space De-biasingcited by 125
  9. 2021Fair Mixup: Fairness via Interpolationcited by 109
  10. 2020Fair Regression with Wasserstein Barycenterscited by 100
  11. 2014Automated Experiments on Ad Privacy Settings: A Tale of Opacity, Choice, and Discriminationcited by 83
  12. 2020Fairness by Learning Orthogonal Disentangled Representationscited by 76
  13. 2018Bias Mitigation Post-processing for Individual and Group Fairnesscited by 72
  14. 2022Fair Contrastive Learning for Facial Attribute Classificationcited by 71
  15. 2016Satisfying Real-world Goals with Dataset Constraintscited by 68
  16. 2021Fairness via Representation Neutralizationcited by 63
  17. 2021Post-processing for Individual Fairnesscited by 61
  18. 2019Leveraging Labeled and Unlabeled Data for Consistent Fair Binary Classificationcited by 60
  19. 2019Conscientious Classification: A Data Scientist's Guide to Discrimination-Aware Classificationcited by 55
  20. 2022Fair and Optimal Classification via Post-Processingcited by 51
  21. 2019Equalized odds postprocessing under imperfect group informationcited by 48
  22. 2018Fairness Under Compositioncited by 43
  23. 2022Provable Stochastic Optimization for Global Contrastive Learning: Small Batch Does Not Harm Performancecited by 43
  24. 2021Object-aware Contrastive Learning for Debiased Scene Representationcited by 35
  25. 2021Wasserstein barycenters are NP-hard to computecited by 28
  26. 2021Classification with abstention but without disparitiescited by 28
  27. 2022Bayes-Optimal Classifiers under Group Fairnesscited by 24
  28. 2022Fair learning with Wasserstein barycenters for non-decomposable performance measurescited by 24
  29. 2015Discrete Wasserstein Barycenters: Optimal Transport for Discrete Datacited by 20
  30. 2022Minimax AUC Fairness: Efficient Algorithm with Provable Convergencecited by 16
  31. 2023FRAPPE: A Group Fairness Framework for Post-Processing Everythingcited by 16
  32. 2023Fairness in Multi-Task Learning via Wasserstein Barycenterscited by 14
  33. 2022Stochastic Methods for AUC Optimization subject to AUC-based Fairness Constraintscited by 9
  34. 2022Repairing Regressors for Fair Binary Classification at Any Decision Thresholdcited by 8
  35. 2023SimFair: A Unified Framework for Fairness-Aware Multi-Label Classificationcited by 7
  36. 2023DualFair: Fair Representation Learning at Both Group and Individual Levels via Contrastive Self-supervisioncited by 6
  37. 2023Bipartite Ranking Fairness through a Model Agnostic Ordering Adjustmentcited by 5
  38. 2023f-FERM: A Scalable Framework for Robust Fair Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 4

50 most cited of 52 All 52 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.