Minority Collective Action for User-Side Fairness
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine learning models often preserve biases present in training data, leading to unfair treatment of certain minority groups. Despite an array of existing firm-side bias mitigation techniques, they typically incur utility costs and require organizational buy-in. Recognizing that many models rely on user-contributed data, end-users can induce fairness through the framework of Algorithmic Collective Action, where a coordinated minority group strategically relabels its own data to enhance fairness, without altering the firm's training process. We propose three practical, model-agnostic methods to approximate ideal relabeling and validate them on real-world datasets. Our findings show that a subgroup of the minority can substantially reduce unfairness with a small impact on the overall prediction error.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Aug 2025.
Builds on
26 of 49 references.
References · 26
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
- 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 804
- 2017The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Separable Datacited by 655
- 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 587
- 2021Just Train Twice: Improving Group Robustness without Training Group Informationcited by 523
- 2021Retiring Adult: New Datasets for Fair Machine Learningcited by 449
- 2017On Fairness and Calibrationcited by 406
- 2019Nuanced Metrics for Measuring Unintended Bias with Real Data for Text Classificationcited by 404
- 2018Learning Adversarially Fair and Transferable Representationscited by 353
- 2020Counterfactual Explanations and Algorithmic Recourses for Machine Learning: A Reviewcited by 174
- 2018Counterfactual Fairness in Text Classification through Robustnesscited by 151
- 2019Inherent Tradeoffs in Learning Fair Representationscited by 144
14 more
- 2023Algorithmic Collective Action in Machine Learningcited by 31
- 2021Fairness without Imputation: A Decision Tree Approach for Fair Prediction with Missing Valuescited by 24
- 2022Why does Throwing Away Data Improve Worst-Group Error?cited by 22
- 2022FARE: Provably Fair Representation Learning with Practical Certificatescited by 21
- 2022How unfair is private learning ?cited by 18
- 2023Unprocessing Seven Years of Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 18
- 2023Causal Context Connects Counterfactual Fairness to Robust Prediction and Group Fairnesscited by 17
- 2023FRAPPE: A Group Fairness Framework for Post-Processing Everythingcited by 16
- 2024Utility-Fairness Trade-Offs and How to Find Themcited by 15
- 2021On Characterizing the Trade-off in Invariant Representation Learningcited by 12
- 2024The Role of Learning Algorithms in Collective Actioncited by 8
- 2024Decline Now: A Combinatorial Model for Algorithmic Collective Actioncited by 8
- 2024Algorithmic Collective Action in Recommender Systems: Promoting Songs by Reordering Playlistscited by 7
- 2025Statistical Collusion by Collectives on Learning Platformscited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
3 papers.