mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

From Text to Structure: Using Large Language Models to Support the Development of Legal Expert Systems

arXiv 2311.04911 ↗First posted 1 Nov 2023cs.CL cs.AI cs.HCcited by 17

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Encoding legislative text in a formal representation is an important prerequisite to different tasks in the field of AI & Law. For example, rule-based expert systems focused on legislation can support laypeople in understanding how legislation applies to them and provide them with helpful context and information. However, the process of analyzing legislation and other sources to encode it in the desired formal representation can be time-consuming and represents a bottleneck in the development of such systems. Here, we investigate to what degree large language models (LLMs), such as GPT-4, are able to automatically extract structured representations from legislation. We use LLMs to create pathways from legislation, according to the JusticeBot methodology for legal decision support systems, evaluate the pathways and compare them to manually created pathways. The results are promising, with 60% of generated pathways being rated as equivalent or better than manually created ones in a blind comparison. The approach suggests a promising path to leverage the capabilities of LLMs to ease the costly development of systems based on symbolic approaches that are transparent and explainable.

Key facts. Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Nov 2023.

Builds on

10 of 33 references.

References · 10

  1. 2023Can GPT-3 Perform Statutory Reasoning?cited by 73
  2. 2023Can large language models build causal graphs?cited by 73
  3. 2023Explaining Legal Concepts with Augmented Large Language Models (GPT-4)cited by 40
  4. 2021Computer-Assisted Creation of Boolean Search Rules for Text Classification in the Legal Domaincited by 12
  5. 2021Sentence Embeddings and High-speed Similarity Search for Fast Computer Assisted Annotation of Legal Documentscited by 9
  6. 2023JusticeBot: A Methodology for Building Augmented Intelligence Tools for Laypeople to Increase Access to Justicecited by 9
  7. 2023LLMediator: GPT-4 Assisted Online Dispute Resolutioncited by 6
  8. 2023Black-Box Analysis: GPTs Across Time in Legal Textual Entailment Taskcited by 6
  9. 2023Beyond Logic Programming for Legal Reasoningcited by 4
  10. 2022Toward an Intelligent Tutoring System for Argument Mining in Legal Textscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 7; 2025: 5; 2026: 4.

17 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024Natural Language Processing for the Legal Domain: A Survey of Tasks, Datasets, Models, and Challengescited by 42
  2. 2024AgentCourt: Simulating Court with Adversarial Evolvable Lawyer Agentscited by 37
  3. 2024Robots in the Middle: Evaluating LLMs in Dispute Resolutioncited by 14
  4. 2025Large Language Models Meet Legal Artificial Intelligence: A Surveycited by 10
  5. 2024Getting in the Door: Streamlining Intake in Civil Legal Services with Large Language Modelscited by 6
  6. 2024It Cannot Be Right If It Was Written by AI: On Lawyers' Preferences of Documents Perceived as Authored by an LLM vs a Humancited by 5
  7. 2024How will advanced AI systems impact democracy?cited by 5
  8. 2025Bye-bye, Bluebook? Automating Legal Drudgery With AI-Augmented Rule Followingcited by 3
  9. 2023Weaving Pathways for Justice with GPT: LLM-driven automated drafting of interactive legal applicationscited by 2
  10. 2025From Answers to Guidance: A Proactive Dialogue System for Legal Documentscited by 1
  11. 2025LegalWebAgent: Empowering Access to Justice via LLM-Based Web Agentscited by 1
  12. 2026From Legal Text to Executable Decision Models: Evaluating Structured Representations for Legal Decision Model Generationcited by 1
5 more
  1. 2024A Path Towards Legal Autonomy: An interoperable and explainable approach to extracting, transforming, loading and computing legal information using large language models, expert systems and Bayesian networkscited by 0
  2. 2025JUDGEBERT: Assessing Legal Meaning Preservation Between Sentencescited by 0
  3. 2026Mirror: A Multi-Agent System for AI-Assisted Ethics Reviewcited by 0
  4. 2026By Their Fruits You Will Know Them: Comparing Formalizations of Law by the Decisions They Encodecited by 0
  5. 2026From Judgments to Issues: Structured Extraction of Legal Reasoning with Citation-Hallucination Controlcited by 0