Getting in the Door: Streamlining Intake in Civil Legal Services with Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Legal intake, the process of finding out if an applicant is eligible for help from a free legal aid program, takes significant time and resources. In part this is because eligibility criteria are nuanced, open-textured, and require frequent revision as grants start and end. In this paper, we investigate the use of large language models (LLMs) to reduce this burden. We describe a digital intake platform that combines logical rules with LLMs to offer eligibility recommendations, and we evaluate the ability of 8 different LLMs to perform this task. We find promising results for this approach to help close the access to justice gap, with the best model reaching an F1 score of .82, while minimizing false negatives.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2024.
Builds on
7 of 49 references.
References · 7
- 2023Can GPT-3 Perform Statutory Reasoning?cited by 73
- 2023Explaining Legal Concepts with Augmented Large Language Models (GPT-4)cited by 40
- 2023Unlocking Practical Applications in Legal Domain: Evaluation of GPT for Zero-Shot Semantic Annotation of Legal Textscited by 33
- 2023From Text to Structure: Using Large Language Models to Support the Development of Legal Expert Systemscited by 17
- 2023How well do SOTA legal reasoning models support abductive reasoning?cited by 13
- 2023JusticeBot: A Methodology for Building Augmented Intelligence Tools for Laypeople to Increase Access to Justicecited by 9
- 2023Intention and Context Elicitation with Large Language Models in the Legal Aid Intake Processcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.
6 papers.
- 2024Analyzing Images of Legal Documents: Toward Multi-Modal LLMs for Access to Justicecited by 4
- 2025That's So FETCH: Fashioning Ensemble Techniques for LLM Classification in Civil Legal Intake and Referralcited by 1
- 2025LegalWebAgent: Empowering Access to Justice via LLM-Based Web Agentscited by 1
- 2026Gender Bias in LLMs: Preliminary Evidence from Shared Parenting Scenario in Czech Family Lawcited by 1
- 2025Retrieving Semantically Similar Decisions under Noisy Institutional Labels: Robust Comparison of Embedding Methodscited by 0
- 2026In With the Old: Enhancing 'Classical' Document Automation with Generative AIcited by 0
- 2026In With the Old: Enhancing 'Classical' Document Automation with Generative AI5 Oct 2026
- 2026Gender Bias in LLMs: Preliminary Evidence from Shared Parenting Scenario in Czech Family Law9 Jan 2026
- 2025Retrieving Semantically Similar Decisions under Noisy Institutional Labels: Robust Comparison of Embedding Methods5 Dec 2025
- 2025LegalWebAgent: Empowering Access to Justice via LLM-Based Web Agents28 Nov 2025
- 2025That's So FETCH: Fashioning Ensemble Techniques for LLM Classification in Civil Legal Intake and Referral8 Sep 2025
- 2024Analyzing Images of Legal Documents: Toward Multi-Modal LLMs for Access to Justice16 Dec 2024