Black-Box Analysis: GPTs Across Time in Legal Textual Entailment Task
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The evolution of Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) models has led to significant advancements in various natural language processing applications, particularly in legal textual entailment. We present an analysis of GPT-3.5 (ChatGPT) and GPT-4 performances on COLIEE Task 4 dataset, a prominent benchmark in this domain. The study encompasses data from Heisei 18 (2006) to Reiwa 3 (2021), exploring the models' abilities to discern entailment relationships within Japanese statute law across different periods. Our preliminary experimental results unveil intriguing insights into the models' strengths and weaknesses in handling legal textual entailment tasks, as well as the patterns observed in model performance. In the context of proprietary models with undisclosed architectures and weights, black-box analysis becomes crucial for evaluating their capabilities. We discuss the influence of training data distribution and the implications on the models' generalizability. This analysis serves as a foundation for future research, aiming to optimize GPT-based models and enable their successful adoption in legal information extraction and entailment applications.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Sep 2023.
Builds on
15 of 27 references.
References · 15
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,375
- 2019ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language Representationscited by 2,790
- 2023Can GPT-3 Perform Statutory Reasoning?cited by 73
- 2021Yes, BM25 is a Strong Baseline for Legal Case Retrievalcited by 24
- 2020JNLP Team: Deep Learning for Legal Processing in COLIEE 2020cited by 14
- 2023How well do SOTA legal reasoning models support abductive reasoning?cited by 13
- 2023A negation detection assessment of GPTs: analysis with the xNot360 datasetcited by 10
- 2022Billions of Parameters Are Worth More Than In-domain Training Data: A case study in the Legal Case Entailment Taskcited by 8
3 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 2.
6 papers.
- 2023From Text to Structure: Using Large Language Models to Support the Development of Legal Expert Systemscited by 17
- 2025Large Language Models Meet Legal Artificial Intelligence: A Surveycited by 10
- 2024Exploring the Nexus of Large Language Models and Legal Systems: A Short Surveycited by 6
- 2024It Cannot Be Right If It Was Written by AI: On Lawyers' Preferences of Documents Perceived as Authored by an LLM vs a Humancited by 5
- 2024Analyzing Images of Legal Documents: Toward Multi-Modal LLMs for Access to Justicecited by 4
- 2025When Trust Collides: Decoding Human-LLM Cooperation Dynamics through the Prisoner's Dilemmacited by 1
- 2025Large Language Models Meet Legal Artificial Intelligence: A Survey12 Sep 2025
- 2025When Trust Collides: Decoding Human-LLM Cooperation Dynamics through the Prisoner's Dilemma10 Mar 2025
- 2024Analyzing Images of Legal Documents: Toward Multi-Modal LLMs for Access to Justice16 Dec 2024
- 2024It Cannot Be Right If It Was Written by AI: On Lawyers' Preferences of Documents Perceived as Authored by an LLM vs a Human9 Jul 2024
- 2024Exploring the Nexus of Large Language Models and Legal Systems: A Short Survey1 Apr 2024
- 2023From Text to Structure: Using Large Language Models to Support the Development of Legal Expert Systems1 Nov 2023