Deepfake detection by exploiting surface anomalies: the SurFake approach
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The ever-increasing use of synthetically generated content in different sectors of our everyday life, one for all media information, poses a strong need for deepfake detection tools in order to avoid the proliferation of altered messages. The process to identify manipulated content, in particular images and videos, is basically performed by looking for the presence of some inconsistencies and/or anomalies specifically due to the fake generation process. Different techniques exist in the scientific literature that exploit diverse ad-hoc features in order to highlight possible modifications. In this paper, we propose to investigate how deepfake creation can impact on the characteristics that the whole scene had at the time of the acquisition. In particular, when an image (video) is captured the overall geometry of the scene (e.g. surfaces) and the acquisition process (e.g. illumination) determine a univocal environment that is directly represented by the image pixel values; all these intrinsic relations are possibly changed by the deepfake generation process. By resorting to the analysis of the characteristics of the surfaces depicted in the image it is possible to obtain a descriptor usable to train a CNN for deepfake detection: we refer to such an approach as SurFake. Experimental results carried out on the FF++ dataset for different kinds of deepfake forgeries and diverse deep learning models confirm that such a feature can be adopted to discriminate between pristine and altered images; furthermore, experiments witness that it can also be combined with visual data to provide a certain improvement in terms of detection accuracy.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Oct 2023.
Builds on
23 of 44 references.
References · 23
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
- 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,773
- 2016Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutionscited by 2,320
- 2016WaveNet: A Generative Model for Raw Audiocited by 1,710
- 2019FaceForensics++: Learning to Detect Manipulated Facial Imagescited by 1,095
- 2017StarGAN: Unified Generative Adversarial Networks for Multi-Domain Image-to-Image Translationcited by 1,036
- 2019Image2StyleGAN: How to Embed Images Into the StyleGAN Latent Space?cited by 675
- 2020A Lip Sync Expert Is All You Need for Speech to Lip Generation In The Wildcited by 669
- 2020Face2Face: Real-time Face Capture and Reenactment of RGB Videoscited by 631
- 2019Face X-ray for More General Face Forgery Detectioncited by 469
11 more
- 2019Deferred Neural Rendering: Image Synthesis using Neural Texturescited by 253
- 2020Learning Self-Consistency for Deepfake Detectioncited by 179
- 2018Fighting Fake News: Image Splice Detection via Learned Self-Consistencycited by 136
- 2016Fast Face-swap Using Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 119
- 2019Recurrent Convolutional Strategies for Face Manipulation Detection in Videoscited by 118
- 2019Deep Learning for Deepfakes Creation and Detection: A Surveycited by 102
- 2021Deepfakes Generation and Detection: State-of-the-art, open challenges, countermeasures, and way forwardcited by 82
- 2021Improving the Efficiency and Robustness of Deepfakes Detection through Precise Geometric Featurescited by 57
- 2019On the generalization of GAN image forensicscited by 36
- 2019UprightNet: Geometry-Aware Camera Orientation Estimation from Single Imagescited by 26
- 2022DepthFake: a depth-based strategy for detecting Deepfake videoscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.
9 papers.
- 2024Deepfake Generation and Detection: A Benchmark and Surveycited by 66
- 2025GenVidBench: A 6-Million Benchmark for AI-Generated Video Detectioncited by 23
- 2024Deepfake Media Generation and Detection in the Generative AI Era: A Survey and Outlookcited by 10
- 2025MAVOS-DD: Multilingual Audio-Video Open-Set Deepfake Detection Benchmarkcited by 9
- 2024Deepfake Media Forensics: State of the Art and Challenges Aheadcited by 6
- 2024Passive Deepfake Detection Across Multi-modalities: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 4
- 2025Unmasking Puppeteers: Leveraging Biometric Leakage to Expose Impersonation in AI-Based Videoconferencingcited by 2
- 2025SFANet: Spatial-Frequency Attention Network for Deepfake Detectioncited by 0
- 2026DF-MoE: Generalizable Deepfake Detection via Multimodal Sparse Mixture-of-Expertscited by 0
- 2026DF-MoE: Generalizable Deepfake Detection via Multimodal Sparse Mixture-of-Experts24 Aug 2026
- 2025SFANet: Spatial-Frequency Attention Network for Deepfake Detection6 Oct 2025
- 2025Unmasking Puppeteers: Leveraging Biometric Leakage to Expose Impersonation in AI-Based Videoconferencing3 Oct 2025
- 2025MAVOS-DD: Multilingual Audio-Video Open-Set Deepfake Detection Benchmark16 May 2025
- 2025GenVidBench: A 6-Million Benchmark for AI-Generated Video Detection20 Jan 2025
- 2024Deepfake Media Generation and Detection in the Generative AI Era: A Survey and Outlook29 Nov 2024
- 2024Passive Deepfake Detection Across Multi-modalities: A Comprehensive Survey26 Nov 2024
- 2024Deepfake Media Forensics: State of the Art and Challenges Ahead1 Aug 2024
- 2024Deepfake Generation and Detection: A Benchmark and Survey26 Mar 2024