Dropout Strategy in Reinforcement Learning: Limiting the Surrogate Objective Variance in Policy Optimization Methods
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Policy-based reinforcement learning algorithms are widely used in various fields. Among them, mainstream policy optimization algorithms such as TRPO and PPO introduce importance sampling into policy iteration, which allows the reuse of historical data. However, this can also lead to a high variance of the surrogate objective and indirectly affects the stability and convergence of the algorithm. In this paper, we first derived an upper bound of the surrogate objective variance, which can grow quadratically with the increase of the surrogate objective. Next, we proposed the dropout technique to avoid the excessive increase of the surrogate objective variance caused by importance sampling. Then, we introduced a general reinforcement learning framework applicable to mainstream policy optimization methods, and applied the dropout technique to the PPO algorithm to obtain the D-PPO variant. Finally, we conduct comparative experiments between D-PPO and PPO algorithms in the Atari 2600 environment, and the results show that D-PPO achieved significant performance improvements compared to PPO, and effectively limited the excessive increase of the surrogate objective variance during training.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Oct 2023.
Builds on
32 of 48 references.
References · 32
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
- 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,211
- 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
- 2016Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 2,218
- 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 1,916
- 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learningcited by 1,704
- 2015Prioritized Experience Replaycited by 1,070
- 2017Rainbow: Combining Improvements in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 774
- 2015Dueling Network Architectures for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 769
- 2017A Distributional Perspective on Reinforcement Learningcited by 743
- 2020Deep Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving: A Surveycited by 698
20 more
- 2016Benchmarking Deep Reinforcement Learning for Continuous Controlcited by 361
- 2020Agent57: Outperforming the Atari Human Benchmarkcited by 300
- 2017Noisy Networks for Explorationcited by 262
- 2020Implementation Matters in Deep Policy Gradients: A Case Study on PPO and TRPOcited by 184
- 2017Emergence of Locomotion Behaviours in Rich Environmentscited by 159
- 2022Exploration in Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Surveycited by 158
- 2020What Matters In On-Policy Reinforcement Learning? A Large-Scale Empirical Studycited by 157
- 2019Mastering Complex Control in MOBA Games with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 150
- 2017Scalable trust-region method for deep reinforcement learning using Kronecker-factored approximationcited by 119
- 2023Motion Planning for Autonomous Driving: The State of the Art and Future Perspectivescited by 112
- 2020Mirror Descent Policy Optimizationcited by 102
- 2017Reproducibility of Benchmarked Deep Reinforcement Learning Tasks for Continuous Controlcited by 92
- 2022You Only Demonstrate Once: Category-Level Manipulation from Single Visual Demonstrationcited by 79
- 2018Simple random search provides a competitive approach to reinforcement learningcited by 75
- 2019Truly Proximal Policy Optimizationcited by 68
- 2021Muesli: Combining Improvements in Policy Optimizationcited by 53
- 2021Generalized Proximal Policy Optimization with Sample Reusecited by 39
- 2018A survey on policy search algorithms for learning robot controllers in a handful of trialscited by 33
- 2018Supervised Policy Update for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 11
- 2017Deterministic Policy Optimization by Combining Pathwise and Score Function Estimators for Discrete Action Spacescited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.