mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Free from Bellman Completeness: Trajectory Stitching via Model-based Return-conditioned Supervised Learning

arXiv 2310.19308 ↗First posted 30 Oct 2023cs.LG cs.AIcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Off-policy dynamic programming (DP) techniques such as Q-learning have proven to be important in sequential decision-making problems. In the presence of function approximation, however, these techniques often diverge due to the absence of Bellman completeness in the function classes considered, a crucial condition for the success of DP-based methods. In this paper, we show how off-policy learning techniques based on return-conditioned supervised learning (RCSL) are able to circumvent these challenges of Bellman completeness, converging under significantly more relaxed assumptions inherited from supervised learning. We prove there exists a natural environment in which if one uses two-layer multilayer perceptron as the function approximator, the layer width needs to grow linearly with the state space size to satisfy Bellman completeness while a constant layer width is enough for RCSL. These findings take a step towards explaining the superior empirical performance of RCSL methods compared to DP-based methods in environments with near-optimal datasets. Furthermore, in order to learn from sub-optimal datasets, we propose a simple framework called MBRCSL, granting RCSL methods the ability of dynamic programming to stitch together segments from distinct trajectories. MBRCSL leverages learned dynamics models and forward sampling to accomplish trajectory stitching while avoiding the need for Bellman completeness that plagues all dynamic programming algorithms. We propose both theoretical analysis and experimental evaluation to back these claims, outperforming state-of-the-art model-free and model-based offline RL algorithms across several simulated robotics problems.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Oct 2023.

Builds on

46 of 61 references.

References · 46

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
  3. 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
  4. 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,211
  5. 2023Diffusion Policy: Visuomotor Policy Learning via Action Diffusioncited by 2,730
  6. 2020Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,777
  7. 2021Decision Transformer: Reinforcement Learning via Sequence Modelingcited by 1,528
  8. 2020D4RL: Datasets for Deep Data-Driven Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,406
  9. 2018Off-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learning without Explorationcited by 1,227
  10. 2017Hindsight Experience Replaycited by 1,096
  11. 2020Mastering Atari with Discrete World Modelscited by 990
  12. 2019Stabilizing Off-Policy Q-Learning via Bootstrapping Error Reductioncited by 833
34 more
  1. 2019When to Trust Your Model: Model-Based Policy Optimizationcited by 753
  2. 2018Deep Reinforcement Learning in a Handful of Trials using Probabilistic Dynamics Modelscited by 748
  3. 2019Behavior Regularized Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 654
  4. 2020MOPO: Model-based Offline Policy Optimizationcited by 630
  5. 2020MOReL : Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 582
  6. 2019Provably Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximationcited by 514
  7. 2022Is Conditional Generative Modeling all you need for Decision-Making?cited by 504
  8. 2021COMBO: Conservative Offline Model-Based Policy Optimizationcited by 365
  9. 2019Information-Theoretic Considerations in Batch Reinforcement Learningcited by 285
  10. 2021Bellman-consistent Pessimism for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 267
  11. 2021RvS: What is Essential for Offline RL via Supervised Learning?cited by 184
  12. 2020Learning Near Optimal Policies with Low Inherent Bellman Errorcited by 180
  13. 2019Is a Good Representation Sufficient for Sample Efficient Reinforcement Learning?cited by 140
  14. 2020What are the Statistical Limits of Offline RL with Linear Function Approximation?cited by 135
  15. 2019Reinforcement Learning Upside Down: Don't Predict Rewards -- Just Map Them to Actionscited by 124
  16. 2019Training Agents using Upside-Down Reinforcement Learningcited by 106
  17. 2021Generalized Decision Transformer for Offline Hindsight Information Matchingcited by 105
  18. 2022Q-learning Decision Transformer: Leveraging Dynamic Programming for Conditional Sequence Modelling in Offline RLcited by 103
  19. 2019Reward-Conditioned Policiescited by 101
  20. 2022When Should We Prefer Offline Reinforcement Learning Over Behavioral Cloning?cited by 86
  21. 2020COG: Connecting New Skills to Past Experience with Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 83
  22. 2022When does return-conditioned supervised learning work for offline reinforcement learning?cited by 73
  23. 2020Exponential Lower Bounds for Planning in MDPs With Linearly-Realizable Optimal Action-Value Functionscited by 71
  24. 2023Elastic Decision Transformercited by 66
  25. 2022You Can't Count on Luck: Why Decision Transformers and RvS Fail in Stochastic Environmentscited by 62
  26. 2022Dichotomy of Control: Separating What You Can Control from What You Cannotcited by 47
  27. 2021An Exponential Lower Bound for Linearly-Realizable MDPs with Constant Suboptimality Gapcited by 40
  28. 2023Emergent Agentic Transformer from Chain of Hindsight Experiencecited by 33
  29. 2021Model-Based Reinforcement Learning via Latent-Space Collocationcited by 27
  30. 2023When should we prefer Decision Transformers for Offline Reinforcement Learning?cited by 20
  31. 2022When is Realizability Sufficient for Off-Policy Reinforcement Learning?cited by 17
  32. 2022Model-based Trajectory Stitching for Improved Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 15
  33. 2019Autoregressive Policies for Continuous Control Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 13
  34. 2022BATS: Best Action Trajectory Stitchingcited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 5; 2026: 4.

11 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Return Augmented Decision Transformer for Off-Dynamics Reinforcement Learning
  2. 2026Lifted Bellman Linear Programming for Offline Reinforcement Learning
  3. 2022Learning Bellman Complete Representations for Offline Policy Evaluation
  4. 2025How to Provably Improve Return Conditioned Supervised Learning?
  5. 2023Critic-Guided Decision Transformer for Offline Reinforcement Learning
  6. 2022Bellman Residual Orthogonalization for Offline Reinforcement Learning
  7. 2026Residuals-based Offline Reinforcement Learning
  8. 2025Closing the Gap between TD Learning and Supervised Learning with Q-Conditioned Maximization