WCLD: Curated Large Dataset of Criminal Cases from Wisconsin Circuit Courts
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine learning based decision-support tools in criminal justice systems are subjects of intense discussions and academic research. There are important open questions about the utility and fairness of such tools. Academic researchers often rely on a few small datasets that are not sufficient to empirically study various real-world aspects of these questions. In this paper, we contribute WCLD, a curated large dataset of 1.5 million criminal cases from circuit courts in the U.S. state of Wisconsin. We used reliable public data from 1970 to 2020 to curate attributes like prior criminal counts and recidivism outcomes. The dataset contains large number of samples from five racial groups, in addition to information like sex and age (at judgment and first offense). Other attributes in this dataset include neighborhood characteristics obtained from census data, detailed types of offense, charge severity, case decisions, sentence lengths, year of filing etc. We also provide pseudo-identifiers for judge, county and zipcode. The dataset will not only enable researchers to more rigorously study algorithmic fairness in the context of criminal justice, but also relate algorithmic challenges with various systemic issues. We also discuss in detail the process of constructing the dataset and provide a datasheet. The WCLD dataset is available at urlhttps://clezdata.github.io/wcld/.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Oct 2023.
Builds on
17 of 34 references.
References · 17
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
- 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,386
- 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 672
- 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 586
- 2021Retiring Adult: New Datasets for Fair Machine Learningcited by 449
- 2017Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairnesscited by 403
- 2016Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact: Learning Classification without Disparate Mistreatmentcited by 369
- 2017Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Artcited by 315
- 2019Problem Formulation and Fairnesscited by 85
- 2021It's COMPASlicated: The Messy Relationship between RAI Datasets and Algorithmic Fairness Benchmarkscited by 61
- 2022Algorithmic Fairness Datasets: the Story so Farcited by 51
5 more
- 2020The Importance of Modeling Data Missingness in Algorithmic Fairness: A Causal Perspectivecited by 17
- 2022A Sandbox Tool to Bias(Stress)-Test Fairness Algorithmscited by 12
- 2023The Progression of Disparities within the Criminal Justice System: Differential Enforcement and Risk Assessment Instrumentscited by 3
- 2023Ghosting the Machine: Judicial Resistance to a Recidivism Risk Assessment Instrumentcited by 3
- 2023On Comparing Fair Classifiers under Data Biascited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
3 papers.