mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Framework for Interpretability in Machine Learning for Medical Imaging

arXiv 2310.01685 ↗First posted 2 Oct 2023cs.LGcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Interpretability for machine learning models in medical imaging (MLMI) is an important direction of research. However, there is a general sense of murkiness in what interpretability means. Why does the need for interpretability in MLMI arise? What goals does one actually seek to address when interpretability is needed? To answer these questions, we identify a need to formalize the goals and elements of interpretability in MLMI. By reasoning about real-world tasks and goals common in both medical image analysis and its intersection with machine learning, we identify five core elements of interpretability: localization, visual recognizability, physical attribution, model transparency, and actionability. From this, we arrive at a framework for interpretability in MLMI, which serves as a step-by-step guide to approaching interpretability in this context. Overall, this paper formalizes interpretability needs in the context of medical imaging, and our applied perspective clarifies concrete MLMI-specific goals and considerations in order to guide method design and improve real-world usage. Our goal is to provide practical and didactic information for model designers and practitioners, inspire developers of models in the medical imaging field to reason more deeply about what interpretability is achieving, and suggest future directions of interpretability research.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 63 of its 175 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2023.

Builds on

63 of 175 references.

References · 63

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  2. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  3. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  4. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  5. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  6. 2017Prototypical Networks for Few-shot Learningcited by 3,015
  7. 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,898
  8. 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,436
  9. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,290
  10. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
  11. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,416
  12. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,319
38 more
  1. 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,089
  2. 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,032
  3. 2018This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image Recognitioncited by 737
  4. 2016The Mythos of Model Interpretabilitycited by 721
  5. 2020Image Segmentation Using Deep Learning: A Surveycited by 660
  6. 2020Towards Faithfully Interpretable NLP Systems: How should we define and evaluate faithfulness?cited by 599
  7. 2017One pixel attack for fooling deep neural networkscited by 582
  8. 2018Towards Robust Interpretability with Self-Explaining Neural Networkscited by 505
  9. 2019Algorithm Unrolling: Interpretable, Efficient Deep Learning for Signal and Image Processingcited by 421
  10. 2017Deep Learning for Medical Image Analysiscited by 401
  11. 2018Confounding variables can degrade generalization performance of radiological deep learning modelscited by 379
  12. 2020Fairness in Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 370
  13. 2019Interpretable machine learning: definitions, methods, and applicationscited by 305
  14. 2022Post-hoc Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 293
  15. 2020Concept Whitening for Interpretable Image Recognitioncited by 225
  16. 2019Causality matters in medical imagingcited by 193
  17. 2019Deep neural network models for computational histopathology: A surveycited by 165
  18. 2021Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in deep learning-based medical image analysiscited by 147
  19. 2017Anatomically Constrained Neural Networks (ACNN): Application to Cardiac Image Enhancement and Segmentationcited by 109
  20. 2021Transparency of Deep Neural Networks for Medical Image Analysis: A Review of Interpretability Methodscited by 83
  21. 2020Use HiResCAM instead of Grad-CAM for faithful explanations of convolutional neural networkscited by 79
  22. 2022Interactive Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 79
  23. 2021XProtoNet: Diagnosis in Chest Radiography with Global and Local Explanationscited by 73
  24. 2021Editing a classifier by rewriting its prediction rulescited by 65
  25. 2016Neural Encoding and Decoding with Deep Learning for Dynamic Natural Visioncited by 60
  26. 2017MDNet: A Semantically and Visually Interpretable Medical Image Diagnosis Networkcited by 56
  27. 2022Framework for Evaluating Faithfulness of Local Explanationscited by 55
  28. 2021Convolutional Dynamic Alignment Networks for Interpretable Classificationscited by 54
  29. 2017Visual Feature Attribution using Wasserstein GANscited by 47
  30. 2019Anatomical Priors in Convolutional Networks for Unsupervised Biomedical Segmentationcited by 40
  31. 2020Fusing Physics-based and Deep Learning Models for Prognosticscited by 40
  32. 2023Geometric Visual Similarity Learning in 3D Medical Image Self-supervised Pre-trainingcited by 37
  33. 2021Using StyleGAN for Visual Interpretability of Deep Learning Models on Medical Imagescited by 35
  34. 2020Interpretable Survival Prediction for Colorectal Cancer using Deep Learningcited by 30
  35. 2020CounteRGAN: Generating Realistic Counterfactuals with Residual Generative Adversarial Netscited by 29
  36. 2023Coherent Concept-based Explanations in Medical Image and Its Application to Skin Lesion Diagnosiscited by 26
  37. 2021Visualizing Data using GTSNEcited by 24
  38. 2020Risk of Training Diagnostic Algorithms on Data with Demographic Biascited by 23

50 most cited of 63 All 63 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 7.

9 papers.