mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Causal Attribution of Model Performance Gaps in Medical Imaging Under Distribution Shifts

arXiv 2512.09094 ↗First posted 9 Dec 2025eess.IV cs.CV cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep learning models for medical image segmentation suffer significant performance drops due to distribution shifts, but the causal mechanisms behind these drops remain poorly understood. We extend causal attribution frameworks to high-dimensional segmentation tasks, quantifying how acquisition protocols and annotation variability independently contribute to performance degradation. We model the data-generating process through a causal graph and employ Shapley values to fairly attribute performance changes to individual mechanisms. Our framework addresses unique challenges in medical imaging: high-dimensional outputs, limited samples, and complex mechanism interactions. Validation on multiple sclerosis (MS) lesion segmentation across 4 centers and 7 annotators reveals context-dependent failure modes: annotation protocol shifts dominate when crossing annotators (7.4% ± 8.9% DSC attribution), while acquisition shifts dominate when crossing imaging centers (6.5% ± 9.1%). This mechanism-specific quantification enables practitioners to prioritize targeted interventions based on deployment context.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Dec 2025.

Builds on

6 of 16 references.

References · 6

  1. 2017Improved Training of Wasserstein GANscited by 2,223
  2. 2018Failing Loudly: An Empirical Study of Methods for Detecting Dataset Shiftcited by 240
  3. 2019Causality matters in medical imagingcited by 193
  4. 2022Causal Machine Learning for Healthcare and Precision Medicinecited by 68
  5. 2021Why did the distribution change?cited by 37
  6. 2023A Framework for Interpretability in Machine Learning for Medical Imagingcited by 9

Built on by

Not cited yet.