mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

An Optimal Agnostic PAC Algorithm

arXiv 2608.06363 ↗First posted 6 Aug 2026cs.LG cs.AI cs.DScited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Let Hsubseteq-1,+1X be a class of finite VC dimension d≥1. Writing L for the binary risk and L^*=minh∈ HL(h), we construct a learner achieving the statistically optimal risk bound: from an i.i.d. sample of size n, for every 0<δ≤ 1/2, with probability at least 1-δ, [ L(widehat h) ≤ L^*+ 7·108left( √fracL^*(d+log(1/δ))n +fracd+log(1/δ)n right). ] This settles the sample complexity of agnostic PAC learning up to universal constants at every fixed L^*, matching the lower bounds of Devroye, Gy"orfi, and Lugosi [A Probabilistic Theory of Pattern Recognition, Springer, 1996].

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Aug 2026.

Builds on

10 of 26 references.

References · 10

  1. 2015The Optimal Sample Complexity of PAC Learningcited by 72
  2. 2021Adversarial Laws of Large Numbers and Optimal Regret in Online Classificationcited by 39
  3. 2022Bagging is an Optimal PAC Learnercited by 34
  4. 2023Optimal PAC Bounds Without Uniform Convergencecited by 33
  5. 2023Optimal Prediction Using Expert Advice and Randomized Littlestone Dimensioncited by 18
  6. 2023Regularization and Optimal Multiclass Learningcited by 15
  7. 2022The One-Inclusion Graph Algorithm is not Always Optimalcited by 11
  8. 2024Revisiting Agnostic PAC Learningcited by 11
  9. 2025On Agnostic PAC Learning in the Small Error Regimecited by 5
  10. 2024Is Transductive Learning Equivalent to PAC Learning?cited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.