mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Decolonial AI Alignment: Openness, Vi'sedsa-Dharma, and Including Excluded Knowledges

arXiv 2309.05030 ↗First posted 10 Sep 2023cs.CY cs.AI stat.MLcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Prior work has explicated the coloniality of artificial intelligence (AI) development and deployment through mechanisms such as extractivism, automation, sociological essentialism, surveillance, and containment. However, that work has not engaged much with alignment: teaching behaviors to a large language model (LLM) in line with desired values, and has not considered a mechanism that arises within that process: moral absolutism -- a part of the coloniality of knowledge. Colonialism has a history of altering the beliefs and values of colonized peoples; in this paper, I argue that this history is recapitulated in current LLM alignment practices and technologies. Furthermore, I suggest that AI alignment be decolonialized using three forms of openness: openness of models, openness to society, and openness to excluded knowledges. This suggested approach to decolonial AI alignment uses ideas from the argumentative moral philosophical tradition of Hinduism, which has been described as an open-source religion. One concept used is vi'sedsa-dharma, or particular context-specific notions of right and wrong. At the end of the paper, I provide a suggested reference architecture to work toward the proposed framework.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 145 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Sep 2023.

Builds on

23 of 145 references.

References · 23

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  3. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 2,950
  4. 2020Artificial Intelligence, Values and Alignmentcited by 443
  5. 2023Towards Measuring the Representation of Subjective Global Opinions in Language Modelscited by 424
  6. 2023Fine-Grained Human Feedback Gives Better Rewards for Language Model Trainingcited by 399
  7. 2023LoraHub: Efficient Cross-Task Generalization via Dynamic LoRA Compositioncited by 359
  8. 2021AI and the Everything in the Whole Wide World Benchmarkcited by 340
  9. 2023Principle-Driven Self-Alignment of Language Models from Scratch with Minimal Human Supervisioncited by 318
  10. 2023From Pretraining Data to Language Models to Downstream Tasks: Tracking the Trails of Political Biases Leading to Unfair NLP Modelscited by 257
  11. 2022Fine-tuning language models to find agreement among humans with diverse preferencescited by 189
  12. 2023Auditing large language models: a three-layered approachcited by 135
11 more
  1. 2023Personalisation within bounds: A risk taxonomy and policy framework for the alignment of large language models with personalised feedbackcited by 86
  2. 2018Racial categories in machine learningcited by 48
  3. 2022Speaking Multiple Languages Affects the Moral Bias of Language Modelscited by 34
  4. 2022The Forgotten Margins of AI Ethicscited by 30
  5. 2023Building Socio-culturally Inclusive Stereotype Resources with Community Engagementcited by 25
  6. 2016The Multi-fidelity Multi-armed Banditcited by 22
  7. 2019Learning Norms from Stories: A Prior for Value Aligned Agentscited by 19
  8. 2020Extending the Machine Learning Abstraction Boundary: A Complex Systems Approach to Incorporate Societal Contextcited by 18
  9. 2019Pretrained AI Models: Performativity, Mobility, and Changecited by 11
  10. 2022Broadening AI Ethics Narratives: An Indic Art Viewcited by 3
  11. 2022Atomist or Holist? A Diagnosis and Vision for More Productive Interdisciplinary AI Ethics Dialoguecited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 5; 2026: 4.

10 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Cultural Bias in Large Language Models: Evaluating AI Agents through Moral Questionnaires
  2. 2025'Too much alignment; not enough culture': Re-balancing cultural alignment practices in LLMs
  3. 2026Evaluating Artificial Intelligence Through a Christian Understanding of Human Flourishing
  4. 2024Dynamic Normativity: Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Value Alignment
  5. 2023Culturally-Attuned Moral Machines: Implicit Learning of Human Value Systems by AI through Inverse Reinforcement Learning
  6. 2025Diverse Human Value Alignment for Large Language Models via Ethical Reasoning
  7. 2024A Moral Imperative: The Need for Continual Superalignment of Large Language Models
  8. 2026Toward a Theory of Value in AI Alignment