mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Extending the Machine Learning Abstraction Boundary: A Complex Systems Approach to Incorporate Societal Context

arXiv 2006.09663 ↗First posted 17 Jun 2020cs.CY cs.LGcited by 18

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning (ML) fairness research tends to focus primarily on mathematically-based interventions on often opaque algorithms or models and/or their immediate inputs and outputs. Such oversimplified mathematical models abstract away the underlying societal context where ML models are conceived, developed, and ultimately deployed. As fairness itself is a socially constructed concept that originates from that societal context along with the model inputs and the models themselves, a lack of an in-depth understanding of societal context can easily undermine the pursuit of ML fairness. In this paper, we outline three new tools to improve the comprehension, identification and representation of societal context. First, we propose a complex adaptive systems (CAS) based model and definition of societal context that will help researchers and product developers to expand the abstraction boundary of ML fairness work to include societal context. Second, we introduce collaborative causal theory formation (CCTF) as a key capability for establishing a sociotechnical frame that incorporates diverse mental models and associated causal theories in modeling the problem and solution space for ML-based products. Finally, we identify community based system dynamics (CBSD) as a powerful, transparent and rigorous approach for practicing CCTF during all phases of the ML product development process. We conclude with a discussion of how these systems theoretic approaches to understand the societal context within which sociotechnical systems are embedded can improve the development of fair and inclusive ML-based products.

Key facts. Cited by 18 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 5; 2023: 4; 2024: 3; 2025: 2.

18 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021Process for Adapting Language Models to Society (PALMS) with Values-Targeted Datasetscited by 179
  2. 2024Safeguarding Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 73
  3. 2024Building Guardrails for Large Language Modelscited by 61
  4. 2022Characteristics of Harmful Text: Towards Rigorous Benchmarking of Language Modelscited by 49
  5. 2022Evaluation Gaps in Machine Learning Practicecited by 48
  6. 2023Ecosystem Graphs: The Social Footprint of Foundation Modelscited by 31
  7. 2021Outlining Traceability: A Principle for Operationalizing Accountability in Computing Systemscited by 26
  8. 2022The four-fifths rule is not disparate impact: a woeful tale of epistemic trespassing in algorithmic fairnesscited by 21
  9. 2022Towards a multi-stakeholder value-based assessment framework for algorithmic systemscited by 12
  10. 2023Decolonial AI Alignment: Openness, Vi'sedsa-Dharma, and Including Excluded Knowledgescited by 10
  11. 2021Thinking Beyond Distributions in Testing Machine Learned Modelscited by 5
  12. 2025FairSense: Long-Term Fairness Analysis of ML-Enabled Systemscited by 3
6 more
  1. 2022System Safety Engineering for Social and Ethical ML Risks: A Case Studycited by 2
  2. 2023Concrete Safety for ML Problems: System Safety for ML Development and Assessmentcited by 2
  3. 2021Deploying clinical machine learning? Consider the following...cited by 1
  4. 2024(Unfair) Norms in Fairness Research: A Meta-Analysiscited by 1
  5. 2025SYMBIOSIS: Systems Thinking and Machine Intelligence for Better Outcomes in Societycited by 1
  6. 2023The Initial Screening Order Problemcited by 0