Augmenting Chest X-ray Datasets with Non-Expert Annotations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The advancement of machine learning algorithms in medical image analysis requires the expansion of training datasets. A popular and cost-effective approach is automated annotation extraction from free-text medical reports, primarily due to the high costs associated with expert clinicians annotating medical images, such as chest X-rays. However, it has been shown that the resulting datasets are susceptible to biases and shortcuts. Another strategy to increase the size of a dataset is crowdsourcing, a widely adopted practice in general computer vision with some success in medical image analysis. In a similar vein to crowdsourcing, we enhance two publicly available chest X-ray datasets by incorporating non-expert annotations. However, instead of using diagnostic labels, we annotate shortcuts in the form of tubes. We collect 3.5k chest drain annotations for NIH-CXR14, and 1k annotations for four different tube types in PadChest, and create the Non-Expert Annotations of Tubes in X-rays (NEATX) dataset. We train a chest drain detector with the non-expert annotations that generalizes well to expert labels. Moreover, we compare our annotations to those provided by experts and show "moderate" to "almost perfect" agreement. Finally, we present a pathology agreement study to raise awareness about the quality of ground truth annotations. We make our dataset available on Zenodo at https://zenodo.org/records/14944064 and our code available at https://github.com/purrlab/chestxr-label-reliability.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Sep 2023.
Builds on
27 of 47 references.
References · 27
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
- 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,803
- 2019CheXpert: A Large Chest Radiograph Dataset with Uncertainty Labels and Expert Comparisoncited by 1,410
- 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,371
- 2017ChestX-ray8: Hospital-scale Chest X-ray Database and Benchmarks on Weakly-Supervised Classification and Localization of Common Thorax Diseasescited by 969
- 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
- 2019PadChest: A large chest x-ray image dataset with multi-label annotated reportscited by 308
- 2019Hidden Stratification Causes Clinically Meaningful Failures in Machine Learning for Medical Imagingcited by 215
- 2018Not-so-supervised: a survey of semi-supervised, multi-instance, and transfer learning in medical image analysiscited by 178
- 2021Reading Race: AI Recognises Patient's Racial Identity In Medical Imagescited by 155
15 more
- 2020CheXclusion: Fairness gaps in deep chest X-ray classifierscited by 153
- 2019A Survey on Active Learning and Human-in-the-Loop Deep Learning for Medical Image Analysiscited by 150
- 2021Can contrastive learning avoid shortcut solutions?cited by 114
- 2019Exploring large scale public medical image datasetscited by 37
- 2023CheXmask: a large-scale dataset of anatomical segmentation masks for multi-center chest x-ray imagescited by 33
- 2016Crowdsourcing in Computer Visioncited by 31
- 2020Risk of Training Diagnostic Algorithms on Data with Demographic Biascited by 23
- 2022Healthsheet: Development of a Transparency Artifact for Health Datasetscited by 23
- 2019A Survey of Crowdsourcing in Medical Image Analysiscited by 20
- 2022Detecting Shortcuts in Medical Images -- A Case Study in Chest X-rayscited by 20
- 2020Deep Learning for Distinguishing Normal versus Abnormal Chest Radiographs and Generalization to Unseen Diseasescited by 12
- 2022Did You Get What You Paid For? Rethinking Annotation Cost of Deep Learning Based Computer Aided Detection in Chest Radiographscited by 5
- 2021ENHANCE (ENriching Health data by ANnotations of Crowd and Experts): A case study for skin lesion classificationcited by 3
- 2018Crowdsourcing Lung Nodules Detection and Annotationcited by 2
- 2020Crowdsourcing Airway Annotations in Chest Computed Tomography Imagescited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
6 papers.
- 2023Fast Diffusion-Based Counterfactuals for Shortcut Removal and Generationcited by 41
- 2024Slicing Through Bias: Explaining Performance Gaps in Medical Image Analysis using Slice Discovery Methodscited by 14
- 2025In the Picture: Medical Imaging Datasets, Artifacts, and their Living Reviewcited by 8
- 2025Fairness and Robustness of CLIP-Based Models for Chest X-rayscited by 1
- 2026From Clinical Intent to Clinical Model: Autonomous Coding-Agents for Clinician-driven AI Developmentcited by 0
- 2026Look What the Probes Dragged In! Real-World Chest X-ray Shortcuts in MedCLIPcited by 0
- 2026Look What the Probes Dragged In! Real-World Chest X-ray Shortcuts in MedCLIP12 Aug 2026
- 2026From Clinical Intent to Clinical Model: Autonomous Coding-Agents for Clinician-driven AI Development18 Apr 2026
- 2025Fairness and Robustness of CLIP-Based Models for Chest X-rays28 Jul 2025
- 2025In the Picture: Medical Imaging Datasets, Artifacts, and their Living Review18 Jan 2025
- 2024Slicing Through Bias: Explaining Performance Gaps in Medical Image Analysis using Slice Discovery Methods17 Jun 2024
- 2023Fast Diffusion-Based Counterfactuals for Shortcut Removal and Generation21 Dec 2023