Look What the Probes Dragged In! Real-World Chest X-ray Shortcuts in MedCLIP
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Medical vision-language models
Abstract (arXiv)
Vision-language models, such as contrastive language-image pre-training (CLIP)-based approaches, have reached state-of-the-art (SOTA) results in medical artificial intelligence. However, recent work reveals that CLIP-based models remain vulnerable to shortcuts. We investigate how real-world shortcuts manifest across different layers of the medical CLIP-based model, MedCLIP, and its vision encoder, a frozen ResNet-50. We attach 17 linear classification probes to the intermediate layers of the ResNet-50 and train them on three different dataset configurations and targets: NIH-CXR14 (pneumothorax) and PadChest (cardiomegaly and pneumothorax). This setup allows us to observe model behaviour during evaluation using subgroup-based calibration and layer-wise confidence curves. We find that the final linear probes achieve a high AUROC but poor calibration in the models. The layer-wise confidence analyses suggest that shortcuts emerge at different depths. Patterns consistent with localised shortcuts, such as drains, appear at later layers, while patterns consistent with diffuse shortcuts, such as scanner-specific noise patterns, emerge earlier, aligning with previous work. Finally, we conduct a manual analysis of the images, which reveals data quality issues in both NIH-CXR14 and PadChest. Our findings underscore that even SOTA models remain vulnerable to shortcuts, and the need for high-quality and well-annotated datasets to draw solid conclusions. Code can be found on our GitHub: https://github.com/nikodice4/MedCLIP_shortcuts.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Medical vision-language models, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 14 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Aug 2026.
Builds on
14 of 21 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 13
- 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,969
- 2022MedCLIP: Contrastive Learning from Unpaired Medical Images and Textcited by 570
- 2019Hidden Stratification Causes Clinically Meaningful Failures in Machine Learning for Medical Imagingcited by 216
- 2024FairCLIP: Harnessing Fairness in Vision-Language Learningcited by 69
- 2022Detecting Shortcuts in Medical Images -- A Case Study in Chest X-rayscited by 20
- 2024Source Matters: Source Dataset Impact on Model Robustness in Medical Imagingcited by 10
- 2025In the Picture: Medical Imaging Datasets, Artifacts, and their Living Reviewcited by 8
- 2023Augmenting Chest X-ray Datasets with Non-Expert Annotationscited by 6
- 2024Mask of truth: model sensitivity to unexpected regions of medical imagescited by 6
- 2025Preventing Shortcut Learning in Medical Image Analysis through Intermediate Layer Knowledge Distillation from Specialist Teacherscited by 4
- 2025Limitations of Public Chest Radiography Datasets for Artificial Intelligence: Label Quality, Domain Shift, Bias and Evaluation Challengescited by 2
- 2025Fairness and Robustness of CLIP-Based Models for Chest X-rayscited by 1
1 more
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025XBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Visual-Language Explanations in Chest Radiography
- 2026ProtoCLIP: Prototype-Aligned Latent Refinement for Robust Zero-Shot Chest X-Ray Classification
- 2024BenchX: A Unified Benchmark Framework for Medical Vision-Language Pretraining on Chest X-Rays
- 2024Visual Prompt Engineering for Vision Language Models in Radiology
- 2026MC-CXR: A Multi-Context Chest X-ray Benchmark for Context-Induced Disruption in Vision-Language Models
- 2025Fairness Analysis of CLIP-Based Foundation Models for X-Ray Image Classification
- 2025Evaluating Vision Language Models (VLMs) for Radiology: A Comprehensive Analysis
- 2025Benchmarking Chest X-ray Diagnosis Models Across Multinational Datasets