mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Survey of Crowdsourcing in Medical Image Analysis

arXiv 1902.09159 ↗First posted 25 Feb 2019cs.CV cs.HCcited by 20

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Rapid advances in image processing capabilities have been seen across many domains, fostered by the application of machine learning algorithms to "big-data". However, within the realm of medical image analysis, advances have been curtailed, in part, due to the limited availability of large-scale, well-annotated datasets. One of the main reasons for this is the high cost often associated with producing large amounts of high-quality meta-data. Recently, there has been growing interest in the application of crowdsourcing for this purpose; a technique that has proven effective for creating large-scale datasets across a range of disciplines, from computer vision to astrophysics. Despite the growing popularity of this approach, there has not yet been a comprehensive literature review to provide guidance to researchers considering using crowdsourcing methodologies in their own medical imaging analysis. In this survey, we review studies applying crowdsourcing to the analysis of medical images, published prior to July 2018. We identify common approaches, challenges and considerations, providing guidance of utility to researchers adopting this approach. Finally, we discuss future opportunities for development within this emerging domain.

Key facts. Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 Feb 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 6; 2022: 4; 2023: 2; 2024: 5; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

20 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021How I failed machine learning in medical imaging -- shortcomings and recommendationscited by 37
  2. 2022Towards Transparency in Dermatology Image Datasets with Skin Tone Annotations by Experts, Crowds, and an Algorithmcited by 35
  3. 2021NuCLS: A scalable crowdsourcing, deep learning approach and dataset for nucleus classification, localization and segmentationcited by 33
  4. 2022Q-Net: Query-Informed Few-Shot Medical Image Segmentationcited by 24
  5. 2022Labeling instructions matter in biomedical image analysiscited by 20
  6. 2021Vessel-CAPTCHA: an efficient learning framework for vessel annotation and segmentationcited by 12
  7. 2021Label noise in segmentation networks : mitigation must deal with biascited by 10
  8. 2024Diversified and Personalized Multi-rater Medical Image Segmentationcited by 9
  9. 2022Weak Supervision for Affordable Modeling of Electrocardiogram Datacited by 8
  10. 2025In the Picture: Medical Imaging Datasets, Artifacts, and their Living Reviewcited by 8
  11. 2023Augmenting Chest X-ray Datasets with Non-Expert Annotationscited by 6
  12. 2024Quality Assured: Rethinking Annotation Strategies in Imaging AIcited by 6
8 more
  1. 2021Terabyte-scale supervised 3D training and benchmarking dataset of the mouse kidneycited by 3
  2. 2024Active Label Refinement for Robust Training of Imbalanced Medical Image Classification Tasks in the Presence of High Label Noisecited by 3
  3. 2023Improving Task Instructions for Data Annotators: How Clear Rules and Higher Pay Increase Performance in Data Annotation in the AI Economycited by 1
  4. 2024How does self-supervised pretraining improve robustness against noisy labels across various medical image classification datasets?cited by 1
  5. 2024Advancing Histopathology with Deep Learning Under Data Scarcity: A Decade in Reviewcited by 1
  6. 2021Rethinking Generalization Performance of Surgical Phase Recognition with Expert-Generated Annotationscited by 0
  7. 2025Crowdsourced human-based computational approach for tagging peripheral blood smear sample images from Sickle Cell Disease patients using non-expert userscited by 0
  8. 2026Active Label Cleaning for Reliable Detection of Electron Dense Deposits in Transmission Electron Microscopy Imagescited by 0