mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Probabilistic Dataset Reconstruction from Interpretable Models

arXiv 2308.15099 ↗First posted 29 Aug 2023cs.AI cs.IT math.ITcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Interpretability is often pointed out as a key requirement for trustworthy machine learning. However, learning and releasing models that are inherently interpretable leaks information regarding the underlying training data. As such disclosure may directly conflict with privacy, a precise quantification of the privacy impact of such breach is a fundamental problem. For instance, previous work have shown that the structure of a decision tree can be leveraged to build a probabilistic reconstruction of its training dataset, with the uncertainty of the reconstruction being a relevant metric for the information leak. In this paper, we propose of a novel framework generalizing these probabilistic reconstructions in the sense that it can handle other forms of interpretable models and more generic types of knowledge. In addition, we demonstrate that under realistic assumptions regarding the interpretable models' structure, the uncertainty of the reconstruction can be computed efficiently. Finally, we illustrate the applicability of our approach on both decision trees and rule lists, by comparing the theoretical information leak associated to either exact or heuristic learning algorithms. Our results suggest that optimal interpretable models are often more compact and leak less information regarding their training data than greedily-built ones, for a given accuracy level.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Aug 2023.

Builds on

18 of 55 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  3. 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 973
  4. 2018The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural Networkscited by 864
  5. 2019Fooling LIME and SHAP: Adversarial Attacks on Post hoc Explanation Methodscited by 443
  6. 2017Machine Learning Models that Remember Too Muchcited by 169
  7. 2020A Survey of Privacy Attacks in Machine Learningcited by 146
  8. 2019Updates-Leak: Data Set Inference and Reconstruction Attacks in Online Learningcited by 122
  9. 2019Fairwashing: the risk of rationalizationcited by 81
  10. 2017Interpretable & Explorable Approximations of Black Box Modelscited by 54
  11. 2017Learning Certifiably Optimal Rule Lists for Categorical Datacited by 50
  12. 2020An Overview of Privacy in Machine Learningcited by 39
6 more
  1. 2021Characterizing the risk of fairwashingcited by 21
  2. 2018Linear Program Reconstruction in Practicecited by 14
  3. 2018When the signal is in the noise: Exploiting Diffix's Sticky Noisecited by 10
  4. 2022Exploiting Fairness to Enhance Sensitive Attributes Reconstructioncited by 10
  5. 2022Can Querying for Bias Leak Protected Attributes? Achieving Privacy With Smooth Sensitivitycited by 8
  6. 2022Dikaios: Privacy Auditing of Algorithmic Fairness via Attribute Inference Attackscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 3.

7 papers.