Smooth Sensitivity for Learning Differentially-Private yet Accurate Rule Lists
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Differentially-private (DP) mechanisms can be embedded into the design of a machine learning algorithm to protect the resulting model against privacy leakage. However, this often comes with a significant loss of accuracy due to the noise added to enforce DP. In this paper, we aim at improving this trade-off for a popular class of machine learning algorithms leveraging the Gini impurity as an information gain criterion to greedily build interpretable models such as decision trees or rule lists. To this end, we establish the smooth sensitivity of the Gini impurity, which can be used to obtain thorough DP guarantees while adding noise scaled with tighter magnitude. We illustrate the applicability of this mechanism by integrating it within a greedy algorithm producing rule list models, motivated by the fact that such models remain understudied in the DP literature. Our theoretical analysis and experimental results confirm that the DP rule lists models integrating smooth sensitivity have higher accuracy that those using other DP frameworks based on global sensitivity, for identical privacy budgets.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Mar 2024.
Builds on
17 of 37 references.
References · 17
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
- 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
- 2021Membership Inference Attacks From First Principlescited by 839
- 2020Label-Only Membership Inference Attackscited by 371
- 2018Adversarial Robustness Toolbox v1.0.0cited by 214
- 2014Differential Privacy and Machine Learning: a Survey and Reviewcited by 66
- 2017Learning Certifiably Optimal Rule Lists for Categorical Datacited by 50
- 2022Fairness via Explanation Quality: Evaluating Disparities in the Quality of Post hoc Explanationscited by 40
- 2016Decision Tree Classification with Differential Privacy: A Surveycited by 17
- 2016Differentially Private Random Decision Forests using Smooth Sensitivitycited by 16
- 2024Trained Random Forests Completely Reveal your Datasetcited by 11
- 2021Optimal Kidney Exchange with Immunosuppressantscited by 9
5 more
- 2018Locally Private Learning without Interaction Requires Separationcited by 7
- 2023Probabilistic Dataset Reconstruction from Interpretable Modelscited by 7
- 2020Differentially Private Deep Learning with Smooth Sensitivitycited by 4
- 2019The Bouncer Problem: Challenges to Remote Explainabilitycited by 3
- 2020Differentially Private Naive Bayes Classifier using Smooth Sensitivitycited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.