Exploiting Fairness to Enhance Sensitive Attributes Reconstruction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In recent years, a growing body of work has emerged on how to learn machine learning models under fairness constraints, often expressed with respect to some sensitive attributes. In this work, we consider the setting in which an adversary has black-box access to a target model and show that information about this model's fairness can be exploited by the adversary to enhance his reconstruction of the sensitive attributes of the training data. More precisely, we propose a generic reconstruction correction method, which takes as input an initial guess made by the adversary and corrects it to comply with some user-defined constraints (such as the fairness information) while minimizing the changes in the adversary's guess. The proposed method is agnostic to the type of target model, the fairness-aware learning method as well as the auxiliary knowledge of the adversary. To assess the applicability of our approach, we have conducted a thorough experimental evaluation on two state-of-the-art fair learning methods, using four different fairness metrics with a wide range of tolerances and with three datasets of diverse sizes and sensitive attributes. The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach to improve the reconstruction of the sensitive attributes of the training set.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Sep 2022.
Builds on
22 of 56 references.
References · 22
- 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
- 2018The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural Networkscited by 847
- 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
- 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 671
- 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 585
- 2021Retiring Adult: New Datasets for Fair Machine Learningcited by 443
- 2017Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairnesscited by 381
- 2020Fairness in Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 369
- 2018AI Fairness 360: An Extensible Toolkit for Detecting, Understanding, and Mitigating Unwanted Algorithmic Biascited by 319
- 2019Differential Privacy Has Disparate Impact on Model Accuracycited by 316
10 more
- 2021Membership Inference Attacks on Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 306
- 2017Machine Learning Models that Remember Too Muchcited by 165
- 2020A Survey of Privacy Attacks in Machine Learningcited by 143
- 2019Updates-Leak: Data Set Inference and Reconstruction Attacks in Online Learningcited by 117
- 2020On the Privacy Risks of Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 82
- 2022Differential Privacy and Fairness in Decisions and Learning Tasks: A Surveycited by 47
- 2020An Overview of Privacy in Machine Learningcited by 39
- 2018Linear Program Reconstruction in Practicecited by 12
- 2018When the signal is in the noise: Exploiting Diffix's Sticky Noisecited by 9
- 2022Dikaios: Privacy Auditing of Algorithmic Fairness via Attribute Inference Attackscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 7; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
10 papers.
- 2023Bias Testing and Mitigation in LLM-based Code Generationcited by 53
- 2023Adversarial attacks and defenses in explainable artificial intelligence: A surveycited by 47
- 2024Trained Random Forests Completely Reveal your Datasetcited by 11
- 2022On the Alignment of Group Fairness with Attribute Privacycited by 9
- 2023Probabilistic Dataset Reconstruction from Interpretable Modelscited by 7
- 2023SoK: Unintended Interactions among Machine Learning Defenses and Riskscited by 6
- 2023Fairness Under Demographic Scarce Regimecited by 4
- 2023Survey on AI Ethics: A Socio-technical Perspectivecited by 4
- 2023SoK: Taming the Triangle -- On the Interplays between Fairness, Interpretability and Privacy in Machine Learningcited by 4
- 2025Training Set Reconstruction from Differentially Private Forests: How Effective is DP?cited by 0
- 2025Training Set Reconstruction from Differentially Private Forests: How Effective is DP?7 Feb 2025
- 2024Trained Random Forests Completely Reveal your Dataset29 Feb 2024
- 2023SoK: Taming the Triangle -- On the Interplays between Fairness, Interpretability and Privacy in Machine Learning22 Dec 2023
- 2023SoK: Unintended Interactions among Machine Learning Defenses and Risks7 Dec 2023
- 2023Survey on AI Ethics: A Socio-technical Perspective28 Nov 2023
- 2023Bias Testing and Mitigation in LLM-based Code Generation3 Sep 2023
- 2023Probabilistic Dataset Reconstruction from Interpretable Models29 Aug 2023
- 2023Fairness Under Demographic Scarce Regime24 Jul 2023
- 2023Adversarial attacks and defenses in explainable artificial intelligence: A survey6 Jun 2023
- 2022On the Alignment of Group Fairness with Attribute Privacy18 Nov 2022