mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Dikaios: Privacy Auditing of Algorithmic Fairness via Attribute Inference Attacks

arXiv 2202.02242 ↗First posted 4 Feb 2022cs.CR cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning (ML) models have been deployed for high-stakes applications. Due to class imbalance in the sensitive attribute observed in the datasets, ML models are unfair on minority subgroups identified by a sensitive attribute, such as race and sex. In-processing fairness algorithms ensure model predictions are independent of sensitive attribute. Furthermore, ML models are vulnerable to attribute inference attacks where an adversary can identify the values of sensitive attribute by exploiting their distinguishable model predictions. Despite privacy and fairness being important pillars of trustworthy ML, the privacy risk introduced by fairness algorithms with respect to attribute leakage has not been studied. We identify attribute inference attacks as an effective measure for auditing blackbox fairness algorithms to enable model builder to account for privacy and fairness in the model design. We proposed Dikaios, a privacy auditing tool for fairness algorithms for model builders which leveraged a new effective attribute inference attack that account for the class imbalance in sensitive attributes through an adaptive prediction threshold. We evaluated Dikaios to perform a privacy audit of two in-processing fairness algorithms over five datasets. We show that our attribute inference attacks with adaptive prediction threshold significantly outperform prior attacks. We highlighted the limitations of in-processing fairness algorithms to ensure indistinguishable predictions across different values of sensitive attributes. Indeed, the attribute privacy risk of these in-processing fairness schemes is highly variable according to the proportion of the sensitive attributes in the dataset. This unpredictable effect of fairness mechanisms on the attribute privacy risk is an important limitation on their utilization which has to be accounted by the model builder.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Feb 2022.

Builds on

33 of 61 references.

References · 33

  1. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
  2. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
  3. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  4. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  5. 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
  6. 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 585
  7. 2018Exploiting Unintended Feature Leakage in Collaborative Learningcited by 509
  8. 2018ML-Leaks: Model and Data Independent Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses on Machine Learning Modelscited by 475
  9. 2020Label-Only Membership Inference Attackscited by 371
  10. 2018Learning Adversarially Fair and Transferable Representationscited by 353
  11. 2019Differential Privacy Has Disparate Impact on Model Accuracycited by 316
  12. 2021Membership Inference Attacks on Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 306
21 more
  1. 2020Systematic Evaluation of Privacy Risks of Machine Learning Modelscited by 273
  2. 2015Censoring Representations with an Adversarycited by 191
  3. 2019MemGuard: Defending against Black-Box Membership Inference Attacks via Adversarial Examplescited by 183
  4. 2018Machine Learning with Membership Privacy using Adversarial Regularizationcited by 177
  5. 2019Stolen Memories: Leveraging Model Memorization for Calibrated White-Box Membership Inferencecited by 168
  6. 2017Data Decisions and Theoretical Implications when Adversarially Learning Fair Representationscited by 165
  7. 2020Membership Leakage in Label-Only Exposurescited by 156
  8. 2013Hacking Smart Machines with Smarter Ones: How to Extract Meaningful Data from Machine Learning Classifierscited by 128
  9. 2017Controllable Invariance through Adversarial Feature Learningcited by 127
  10. 2018Invariant Representations without Adversarial Trainingcited by 111
  11. 2020On the Privacy Risks of Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 82
  12. 2019Overlearning Reveals Sensitive Attributescited by 74
  13. 2021Mitigating Membership Inference Attacks by Self-Distillation Through a Novel Ensemble Architecturecited by 63
  14. 2018AttriGuard: A Practical Defense Against Attribute Inference Attacks via Adversarial Machine Learningcited by 58
  15. 2019Fair Decision Making using Privacy-Protected Datacited by 58
  16. 2016Learning to Pivot with Adversarial Networkscited by 55
  17. 2021On the (In)Feasibility of Attribute Inference Attacks on Machine Learning Modelscited by 30
  18. 2021Honest-but-Curious Nets: Sensitive Attributes of Private Inputs Can Be Secretly Coded into the Classifiers' Outputscited by 18
  19. 2016Minimax Filter: Learning to Preserve Privacy from Inference Attackscited by 16
  20. 2020Fair Inputs and Fair Outputs: The Incompatibility of Fairness in Privacy and Accuracycited by 6
  21. 2020GECKO: Reconciling Privacy, Accuracy and Efficiency in Embedded Deep Learningcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 2.

5 papers.