mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

An Overview of Privacy in Machine Learning

arXiv 2005.08679 ↗First posted 18 May 2020cs.LG cs.AI cs.CRcited by 39

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Over the past few years, providers such as Google, Microsoft, and Amazon have started to provide customers with access to software interfaces allowing them to easily embed machine learning tasks into their applications. Overall, organizations can now use Machine Learning as a Service (MLaaS) engines to outsource complex tasks, e.g., training classifiers, performing predictions, clustering, etc. They can also let others query models trained on their data. Naturally, this approach can also be used (and is often advocated) in other contexts, including government collaborations, citizen science projects, and business-to-business partnerships. However, if malicious users were able to recover data used to train these models, the resulting information leakage would create serious issues. Likewise, if the inner parameters of the model are considered proprietary information, then access to the model should not allow an adversary to learn such parameters. In this document, we set to review privacy challenges in this space, providing a systematic review of the relevant research literature, also exploring possible countermeasures. More specifically, we provide ample background information on relevant concepts around machine learning and privacy. Then, we discuss possible adversarial models and settings, cover a wide range of attacks that relate to private and/or sensitive information leakage, and review recent results attempting to defend against such attacks. Finally, we conclude with a list of open problems that require more work, including the need for better evaluations, more targeted defenses, and the study of the relation to policy and data protection efforts.

Key facts. Cited by 39 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 18 May 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 9; 2022: 7; 2023: 9; 2024: 8; 2025: 5; 2026: 1.

39 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021Membership Inference Attacks on Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 306
  2. 2021Trustworthy AI: A Computational Perspectivecited by 93
  3. 2021ML-Doctor: Holistic Risk Assessment of Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning Modelscited by 79
  4. 2021Survey: Leakage and Privacy at Inference Timecited by 44
  5. 2024Generative AI in EU Law: Liability, Privacy, Intellectual Property, and Cybersecuritycited by 21
  6. 2021Honest-but-Curious Nets: Sensitive Attributes of Private Inputs Can Be Secretly Coded into the Classifiers' Outputscited by 18
  7. 2021Membership Inference Attacks Against Self-supervised Speech Modelscited by 16
  8. 2021Bounding Information Leakage in Machine Learningcited by 11
  9. 2023Learning from Aggregated Data: Curated Bags versus Random Bagscited by 11
  10. 2024Trained Random Forests Completely Reveal your Datasetcited by 11
  11. 2022Exploiting Fairness to Enhance Sensitive Attributes Reconstructioncited by 10
  12. 2023Patchwork Learning: A Paradigm Towards Integrative Analysis across Diverse Biomedical Data Sourcescited by 10
27 more
  1. 2021PRICURE: Privacy-Preserving Collaborative Inference in a Multi-Party Settingcited by 9
  2. 2022On the Alignment of Group Fairness with Attribute Privacycited by 9
  3. 2022Can Querying for Bias Leak Protected Attributes? Achieving Privacy With Smooth Sensitivitycited by 8
  4. 2023Probabilistic Dataset Reconstruction from Interpretable Modelscited by 7
  5. 2022FaceMAE: Privacy-Preserving Face Recognition via Masked Autoencoderscited by 6
  6. 2023Model Reporting for Certifiable AI: A Proposal from Merging EU Regulation into AI Developmentcited by 6
  7. 2023SoK: Unintended Interactions among Machine Learning Defenses and Riskscited by 6
  8. 2024SoK: Can Trajectory Generation Combine Privacy and Utility?cited by 6
  9. 2021MixNN: Protection of Federated Learning Against Inference Attacks by Mixing Neural Network Layerscited by 5
  10. 2023Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning: Methods, Applications, Visionary Prospects, and Challengescited by 5
  11. 2024Are Neuromorphic Architectures Inherently Privacy-preserving? An Exploratory Studycited by 5
  12. 2022Label-only Model Inversion Attack: The Attack that Requires the Least Informationcited by 4
  13. 2023Privacy Measurement in Tabular Synthetic Data: State of the Art and Future Research Directionscited by 4
  14. 2023SoK: Taming the Triangle -- On the Interplays between Fairness, Interpretability and Privacy in Machine Learningcited by 4
  15. 2025From Counterfactuals to Trees: Competitive Analysis of Model Extraction Attackscited by 3
  16. 2025When Better Features Mean Greater Risks: The Performance-Privacy Trade-Off in Contrastive Learningcited by 3
  17. 2024Learning from Aggregate responses: Instance Level versus Bag Level Loss Functionscited by 2
  18. 2024Combining Machine Learning Defenses without Conflictscited by 2
  19. 2025On the Privacy-Preserving Properties of Spiking Neural Networks with Unique Surrogate Gradients and Quantization Levelscited by 2
  20. 2025AttackPilot: Autonomous Inference Attacks Against ML Services With LLM-Based Agentscited by 2
  21. 2022Memorization of Named Entities in Fine-tuned BERT Modelscited by 1
  22. 2022Holistic risk assessment of inference attacks in machine learningcited by 1
  23. 2023Trustworthy Representation Learning Across Domainscited by 1
  24. 2024Hierarchical Conditional Tabular GAN for Multi-Tabular Synthetic Data Generationcited by 1
  25. 2025Federated Learning for Commercial Image Sourcescited by 1
  26. 2024Evaluation of Predictive Reliability to Foster Trust in Artificial Intelligence. A case study in Multiple Sclerosiscited by 0
  27. 2026SynMulti: Synthetic-to-Real Learning for Multimodal Video Understandingcited by 0