mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Fast and Accurate Transferability Measurement by Evaluating Intra-class Feature Variance

arXiv 2308.05986 ↗First posted 11 Aug 2023cs.LGcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Given a set of pre-trained models, how can we quickly and accurately find the most useful pre-trained model for a downstream task? Transferability measurement is to quantify how transferable is a pre-trained model learned on a source task to a target task. It is used for quickly ranking pre-trained models for a given task and thus becomes a crucial step for transfer learning. Existing methods measure transferability as the discrimination ability of a source model for a target data before transfer learning, which cannot accurately estimate the fine-tuning performance. Some of them restrict the application of transferability measurement in selecting the best supervised pre-trained models that have classifiers. It is important to have a general method for measuring transferability that can be applied in a variety of situations, such as selecting the best self-supervised pre-trained models that do not have classifiers, and selecting the best transferring layer for a target task. In this work, we propose TMI (TRANSFERABILITY MEASUREMENT WITH INTRA-CLASS FEATURE VARIANCE), a fast and accurate algorithm to measure transferability. We view transferability as the generalization of a pre-trained model on a target task by measuring intra-class feature variance. Intra-class variance evaluates the adaptability of the model to a new task, which measures how transferable the model is. Compared to previous studies that estimate how discriminative the models are, intra-class variance is more accurate than those as it does not require an optimal feature extractor and classifier. Extensive experiments on real-world datasets show that TMI outperforms competitors for selecting the top-5 best models, and exhibits consistently better correlation in 13 out of 17 cases.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Aug 2023.

Builds on

16 of 33 references.

References · 16

  1. 2014How transferable are features in deep neural networks?cited by 1,225
  2. 2018Taskonomy: Disentangling Task Transfer Learningcited by 634
  3. 2019Multi-Similarity Loss with General Pair Weighting for Deep Metric Learningcited by 368
  4. 2019Task2Vec: Task Embedding for Meta-Learningcited by 205
  5. 2020LEEP: A New Measure to Evaluate Transferability of Learned Representationscited by 188
  6. 2021LogME: Practical Assessment of Pre-trained Models for Transfer Learningcited by 172
  7. 2019Transferability and Hardness of Supervised Classification Taskscited by 127
  8. 2020A unifying mutual information view of metric learning: cross-entropy vs. pairwise lossescited by 100
  9. 2022An Information-Theoretic Approach to Transferability in Task Transfer Learningcited by 81
  10. 2018Improving Generalization via Scalable Neighborhood Component Analysiscited by 53
  11. 2021DINE: Domain Adaptation from Single and Multiple Black-box Predictorscited by 51
  12. 2021Frustratingly Easy Transferability Estimationcited by 45
4 more
  1. 2021Unsupervised Domain Adaptation of Black-Box Source Modelscited by 32
  2. 2022Multi-Source Unsupervised Domain Adaptation via Pseudo Target Domaincited by 28
  3. 2022Unknown-Aware Domain Adversarial Learning for Open-Set Domain Adaptationcited by 21
  4. 2017Heterogeneous domain adaptation: An unsupervised approachcited by 17

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

9 papers.