mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Assessing Pre-Trained Models for Transfer Learning Through Distribution of Spectral Components

arXiv 2412.19085 ↗First posted 26 Dec 2024cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Pre-trained model assessment for transfer learning aims to identify the optimal candidate for the downstream tasks from a model hub, without the need of time-consuming fine-tuning. Existing advanced works mainly focus on analyzing the intrinsic characteristics of the entire features extracted by each pre-trained model or how well such features fit the target labels. This paper proposes a novel perspective for pre-trained model assessment through the Distribution of Spectral Components (DISCO). Through singular value decomposition of features extracted from pre-trained models, we investigate different spectral components and observe that they possess distinct transferability, contributing diversely to the fine-tuning performance. Inspired by this, we propose an assessment method based on the distribution of spectral components which measures the proportions of their corresponding singular values. Pre-trained models with features concentrating on more transferable components are regarded as better choices for transfer learning. We further leverage the labels of downstream data to better estimate the transferability of each spectral component and derive the final assessment criterion. Our proposed method is flexible and can be applied to both classification and regression tasks. We conducted comprehensive experiments across three benchmarks and two tasks including image classification and object detection, demonstrating that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance in choosing proper pre-trained models from the model hub for transfer learning.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Dec 2024.

Builds on

36 of 50 references.

References · 36

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  4. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  5. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  6. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  7. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  8. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
  9. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  10. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  11. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,773
  12. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,712
24 more
  1. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
  2. 2020Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignmentscited by 2,845
  3. 2020Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive Learningcited by 2,282
  4. 2019HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processingcited by 2,201
  5. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,110
  6. 2018Unsupervised Feature Learning via Non-Parametric Instance-level Discriminationcited by 1,838
  7. 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,701
  8. 2014How transferable are features in deep neural networks?cited by 1,216
  9. 2018Deep Clustering for Unsupervised Learning of Visual Featurescited by 1,020
  10. 2018MnasNet: Platform-Aware Neural Architecture Search for Mobilecited by 937
  11. 2020What Makes for Good Views for Contrastive Learning?cited by 843
  12. 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 722
  13. 2020Prototypical Contrastive Learning of Unsupervised Representationscited by 636
  14. 2019Self-labelling via simultaneous clustering and representation learningcited by 525
  15. 2013DeCAF: A Deep Convolutional Activation Feature for Generic Visual Recognitioncited by 422
  16. 2020LEEP: A New Measure to Evaluate Transferability of Learned Representationscited by 182
  17. 2021LogME: Practical Assessment of Pre-trained Models for Transfer Learningcited by 168
  18. 2019Transferability and Hardness of Supervised Classification Taskscited by 125
  19. 2020Ranking Neural Checkpointscited by 50
  20. 2021Scalable Diverse Model Selection for Accessible Transfer Learningcited by 40
  21. 2022PACTran: PAC-Bayesian Metrics for Estimating the Transferability of Pretrained Models to Classification Taskscited by 30
  22. 2022Not All Models Are Equal: Predicting Model Transferability in a Self-challenging Fisher Spacecited by 30
  23. 2024Which Model to Transfer? A Survey on Transferability Estimationcited by 13
  24. 2023Fast and Accurate Transferability Measurement by Evaluating Intra-class Feature Variancecited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 1.

6 papers.