mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Exploring Structural Degradation in Dense Representations for Self-supervised Learning

arXiv 2510.17299 ↗First posted 20 Oct 2025cs.CVcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this work, we observe a counterintuitive phenomenon in self-supervised learning (SSL): longer training may impair the performance of dense prediction tasks (e.g., semantic segmentation). We refer to this phenomenon as Self-supervised Dense Degradation (SDD) and demonstrate its consistent presence across sixteen state-of-the-art SSL methods with various losses, architectures, and datasets. When the model performs suboptimally on dense tasks at the end of training, measuring the performance during training becomes essential. However, evaluating dense performance effectively without annotations remains an open challenge. To tackle this issue, we introduce a Dense representation Structure Estimator (DSE), composed of a class-relevance measure and an effective dimensionality measure. The proposed DSE is both theoretically grounded and empirically validated to be closely correlated with the downstream performance. Based on this metric, we introduce a straightforward yet effective model selection strategy and a DSE-based regularization method. Experiments on sixteen SSL methods across four benchmarks confirm that model selection improves mIoU by 3.0% on average with negligible computational cost. Additionally, DSE regularization consistently mitigates the effects of dense degradation. Code is available at https://github.com/EldercatSAM/SSL-Degradation.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 72 of its 89 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Oct 2025.

Builds on

72 of 89 references.

References · 72

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  3. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
  4. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
  5. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
  6. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
  7. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
  8. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,712
  9. 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,427
  10. 2020Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learningcited by 2,853
  11. 2020Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignmentscited by 2,845
  12. 2020Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive Learningcited by 2,282
38 more
  1. 2018Unsupervised Feature Learning via Non-Parametric Instance-level Discriminationcited by 1,838
  2. 2021Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy Reductioncited by 1,818
  3. 2021An Empirical Study of Training Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 1,610
  4. 2020Understanding Contrastive Representation Learning through Alignment and Uniformity on the Hyperspherecited by 1,393
  5. 2020Big Self-Supervised Models are Strong Semi-Supervised Learnerscited by 1,375
  6. 2022VideoMAE: Masked Autoencoders are Data-Efficient Learners for Self-Supervised Video Pre-Trainingcited by 1,305
  7. 2019Contrastive Multiview Codingcited by 1,297
  8. 2025DINOv3cited by 1,297
  9. 2018Learning deep representations by mutual information estimation and maximizationcited by 1,265
  10. 2021SimMIM: A Simple Framework for Masked Image Modelingcited by 1,147
  11. 2021VICReg: Variance-Invariance-Covariance Regularization for Self-Supervised Learningcited by 1,013
  12. 2023Self-Supervised Learning from Images with a Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecturecited by 982
  13. 2017The 2017 DAVIS Challenge on Video Object Segmentationcited by 942
  14. 2021iBOT: Image BERT Pre-Training with Online Tokenizercited by 891
  15. 2016COCO-Stuff: Thing and Stuff Classes in Contextcited by 858
  16. 2020What Makes for Good Views for Contrastive Learning?cited by 843
  17. 2019Data-Efficient Image Recognition with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 672
  18. 2020Dense Contrastive Learning for Self-Supervised Visual Pre-Trainingcited by 512
  19. 2019Fantastic Generalization Measures and Where to Find Themcited by 507
  20. 2021Provable Guarantees for Self-Supervised Deep Learning with Spectral Contrastive Losscited by 311
  21. 2022Context Autoencoder for Self-Supervised Representation Learningcited by 297
  22. 2022Self-Supervised Contrastive Pre-Training For Time Series via Time-Frequency Consistencycited by 246
  23. 2021Self-Supervised Pretraining of 3D Features on any Point-Cloudcited by 217
  24. 2020LEEP: A New Measure to Evaluate Transferability of Learned Representationscited by 182
  25. 2021LogME: Practical Assessment of Pre-trained Models for Transfer Learningcited by 168
  26. 2021Efficient Visual Pretraining with Contrastive Detectioncited by 150
  27. 2021Efficient Self-supervised Vision Transformers for Representation Learningcited by 149
  28. 2022RankMe: Assessing the downstream performance of pretrained self-supervised representations by their rankcited by 145
  29. 2020Learning Diverse and Discriminative Representations via the Principle of Maximal Coding Rate Reductioncited by 141
  30. 2019Transferability and Hardness of Supervised Classification Taskscited by 125
  31. 2022VICRegL: Self-Supervised Learning of Local Visual Featurescited by 118
  32. 2021Towards the Generalization of Contrastive Self-Supervised Learningcited by 99
  33. 2023Self-Supervised Learning for Time Series Analysis: Taxonomy, Progress, and Prospectscited by 97
  34. 2022Self-Supervised Learning of Object Parts for Semantic Segmentationcited by 90
  35. 2019Representation Similarity Analysis for Efficient Task taxonomy & Transfer Learningcited by 86
  36. 2022Mugs: A Multi-Granular Self-Supervised Learning Frameworkcited by 54
  37. 2021Transferability Estimation using Bhattacharyya Class Separabilitycited by 53
  38. 2020Ranking Neural Checkpointscited by 50

50 most cited of 72 All 72 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

4 papers.