How Large Language Models Are Changing MOOC Essay Answers: A Comparison of Pre- and Post-LLM Responses
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The release of ChatGPT in late 2022 caused a flurry of activity and concern in the academic and educational communities. Some see the tool's ability to generate human-like text that passes at least cursory inspections for factual accuracy ``often enough'' a golden age of information retrieval and computer-assisted learning. Some, on the other hand, worry the tool may lead to unprecedented levels of academic dishonesty and cheating. In this work, we quantify some of the effects of the emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) on online education by analyzing a multi-year dataset of student essay responses from a free university-level MOOC on AI ethics. Our dataset includes essays submitted both before and after ChatGPT's release. We find that the launch of ChatGPT coincided with significant changes in both the length and style of student essays, mirroring observations in other contexts such as academic publishing. We also observe -- as expected based on related public discourse -- changes in prevalence of key content words related to AI and LLMs, but not necessarily the general themes or topics discussed in the student essays as identified through (dynamic) topic modeling.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Apr 2025.
Builds on
10 of 35 references.
References · 10
- 2024Mapping the Increasing Use of LLMs in Scientific Paperscited by 118
- 2024Delving into LLM-assisted writing in biomedical publications through excess vocabularycited by 78
- 2024Beware of Metacognitive Laziness: Effects of Generative Artificial Intelligence on Learning Motivation, Processes, and Performancecited by 58
- 2023Towards Understanding the Interplay of Generative Artificial Intelligence and the Internetcited by 54
- 2024Is ChatGPT Transforming Academics' Writing Style?cited by 26
- 2023Classification of Human- and AI-Generated Texts: Investigating Features for ChatGPTcited by 19
- 2023Can We Trust AI-Generated Educational Content? Comparative Analysis of Human and AI-Generated Learning Resourcescited by 12
- 2023Playing with words: Comparing the vocabulary and lexical diversity of ChatGPT and humanscited by 8
- 2023The Language Labyrinth: Constructive Critique on the Terminology Used in the AI Discoursecited by 5
- 2023"Genlangs" and Zipf's Law: Do languages generated by ChatGPT statistically look human?cited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 2.
5 papers.
- 2025Opportunities and Challenges of LLMs in Education: An NLP Perspectivecited by 6
- 2025On the Detectability of LLM-Generated Text: What Exactly Is LLM-Generated Text?cited by 3
- 2025The Variance Paradox: How AI Reduces Diversity but Increases Noveltycited by 1
- 2026The Crutch or the Ceiling? How Different Generations of LLMs Shape EFL Student Writingscited by 0
- 2026Measuring Changes in Instructor Class Design and Student Learning After the Release of Large Language Models (LLMs)cited by 0
- 2026The Crutch or the Ceiling? How Different Generations of LLMs Shape EFL Student Writings16 Apr 2026
- 2026Measuring Changes in Instructor Class Design and Student Learning After the Release of Large Language Models (LLMs)12 Apr 2026
- 2025On the Detectability of LLM-Generated Text: What Exactly Is LLM-Generated Text?23 Oct 2025
- 2025The Variance Paradox: How AI Reduces Diversity but Increases Novelty20 Aug 2025
- 2025Opportunities and Challenges of LLMs in Education: An NLP Perspective30 Jul 2025